Skip to content

· Private foundation

Palmer Cw Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$269kHuman Services$188kFood & Nutrition$144kEducation$108kReligion$75kArts & Culture$62kPublic Benefit$28kYouth Development$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $219,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $244,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $179k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATION SURF$15,000
FOOTHILLS FOOD BANK$15,000
ST. VINCENT DE PAUL$12,000
ST. MARY'S FOOD BANK$12,000
MIDWEST FOODBANK$12,000
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$12,000
FOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN$11,000
ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK$10,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION ARIZONA$10,000
HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$10,000
THE FOUNDATION AT FCOE$10,000
SALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIX$10,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$640k · 37 repeat orgs$346k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
21

Total granted

$640k
$149k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIX
    4× · 2019–2024 · $50k
  • MF
    MIDWEST FOOD BANK
    4× · 2019–2024 · $47k
  • SM
    ST. MARY'S FOOD BANK
    3× · 2019–2023 · $43k

Funded once

  • HH
    HONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INFECTION CONTROL
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • HH
    HONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION STOP THE BLEED
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • FM
    FIELD MUSEUM NATIVE AMERICAN HALL
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
3
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
4
First Choice Community Healthcare Inc

To improve the health, life skills, and well-being of all members of the communities we serve by providing primary medical, dental, and behavioral health care, including health education, to the residents of bernalillo, valencia, and santa…

Health
5
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
6
Family Health Services Corporation

Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.

Health
7
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
8
Flagstaff Medical Center

Improving health, healing people.

Health
9
Family Healthcare Network

To provide health care services to socially and economically distressed sectors of the southern San Joaquin Valley in California.

Health
10
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
11
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Feather River Hospital

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Valley; the most unlike its peers is Granger Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIX: $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF PHOENIXMIDWEST FOOD BANK: $47,000 · OtherMIDWEST FOOD BANKST. MARY'S FOOD BANK: $42,500 · OtherST. VINCENT DE PAUL: $42,500 · OtherHONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION INFECTION CONTROL: $40,000 · OtherFOUNDATION AT FCOE: $32,500 · OtherCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $29,000 · Other+59 more: $557,000 · Other+59 moreOPERATION SURF: $15,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $12,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $11,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · HealthFamily Access Network Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the Valley: $10,000 · Human ServicesFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $3,000 · Human ServicesDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $12,000 · ReligionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $12,000 · Food & NutritionHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $10,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FCOE INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$840,500Health$68,000Human Services$33,000Religion$12,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Education$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoothills Food Bank: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION SURF: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Access Network Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Caring Corps Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FCOE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKiwanis International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTHE FETCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Foothills Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SURF ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Family Access Network Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
  • Who funds Foothills Caring Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Express FoundationNY12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Palmer Cw Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Palmer Cw Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $395k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Palmer Cw Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph