· Public charity
Painters and Allied Trades for Children's Hope Foundation
The foundation is dedicated to supporting youth institutions and programs to help ensure that children in need have the opportunities to live lives of play and comfort that every child deserves.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $180,214 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $276,664 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $96,450 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOSEPH SMITH VOCATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP | $100,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION WISCONSIN | $20,000 |
| KIDNEY FOR KIDS | $10,000 |
| CSUSM ATHELTICS | $10,000 |
| CREATIVE ART WORKS | $10,000 |
| NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| LCLAA LA CHAPTER | $7,500 |
| PATCH CO DC 16 | $6,500 |
| GALIS ATHLETIC CLUB INC | $6,214 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NKNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL5× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +57%
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC3× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +18%- MTMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- MCMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +27%
- RMRock Minstries of Philadelphia Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +53%
- SLSCHOOLKIDZCOM LLCone grant, 2018 · $78k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
Summary
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.
The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…
Friends of the children - chicago has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…
Children's rights is a national advocacy organization that investigates, exposes, and combats violations of the rights of children. through strategic advocacy and civil rights impact litigation, children's rights holds governments…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kidneys for Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rock Minstries of Philadelphia Inc ↗
- Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
- Who funds Michael P Donatucci Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds JORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER P GARDNER FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds NYC KIDS RISE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds Houston Independent School District Foundation ↗
- Who funds Southwest Youth And Family Services ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEYOND WALLS INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of Greater Elgin Area ↗
- Who funds NAMI OF DUPAGE COUNTY ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds BRAVEHEART CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds Illinois Conservation Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLLINSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOX VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF ILLINOIS VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Kidneys for Kids ↗
- Who funds Creative Arts Workshops for Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds CITIES IN SCHOOLS AURORA 2000 INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIGUEL CONTRERAS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Union of Painters and Allied Trades · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #98 · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · American Express Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Painters and Allied Trades for Children's Hope Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beyond Walls Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Painters and Allied Trades for Children's Hope Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Painters and Allied Trades for Children's Hope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.