Skip to content
P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc

Our mission is to ensure all young people across Bexar County are ready for the future.

$3.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.3MYouth Development$1.1MEducation$743kEmployment$455kCrime & Legal$157kHuman Services$130kHealth$76kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $390k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.2M
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
San Antonio Area Foundation$2,292,000
United Way of San Antonio$870,000
CAST Network$200,000
Communities in Schools San Antonio$190,000
Alamo College District$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Up Together-FII-National: $50k → 10%American Indians in Texas Spanish Colonial Mission: $70k → 16%100 Black Men of San Antonio Inc: $80k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$999k · 5 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
22

Total granted

$999k
$711k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+28%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEmploymentHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $380k · revenue +31%
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO
    3× · 2021–2024 · $310k · revenue +55%
  • CF
    Center For Applied Science & Technology Network
    2× · 2022–2024 · $205k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • 1B
    100 BLACK MEN OF SAN ANTONIO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue +28%
  • TA
    Texas A&M San Antonio Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $80k · revenue -68%
  • EH
    EMPOWER HOUSE SAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $70k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
2
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
3
San Antonio Preparatory Charter School

San antonio preparatory charter school provides a college preparaory education through high quality instruction and rigorous curriculum inside a challenging and supportive learning environment ensuring all students can learn, grow, and…

Education
4
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
5
San Antonio Teachers Council

Represent public education employees in labor related matters, to include matters specific to wages, hours, and thier condition of employment.

—
6
Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in Science

Sacnas is an inclusive organization dedicated to fostering the success of chicanos/hispanics and native americans, from college students to professionals, in attaining advanced degrees, careers, and positions of leadership in stem.

Science & Tech
7
Choose to Succeed Inc

To ensure that every family has access to exceptional, tuition-free public education options by attracting the nation's best public charter schools to san antonio, tx.

Philanthropy
8
University of Texas At San Antonio Alumni Association

To engage our alumni in activities that will advance utsa as a top-tier institution. our focus is to deliver value-added services and events where our alumni can connect with each other, with current students and/or with the university. we…

—
9
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
10
Kipp San Antonio Inc

The mission of kipp san antonio is to enable students from underserved communities to develop the knowledge, skills, and character necessary to graduate from college, lead in their communities and command their future.

—
11
San Antonio Association for Financial Professionals

The san antonio association for financial professionals [saafp] is a regional educational forum for individuals involved in all aspects of the finance profession. saafp hosts educational luncheons and networking events to facilitate the…

—
12
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Area Foundation; the most unlike its peers is 100 Black Men of San Antonio Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $2,292,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATIONUnited Way of San Antonio: $870,000 · OtherUnited Way of San Antonio+13 more: $321,000 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $310,352 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN S…Center For Applied Science & Technology Network: $205,000 · EducationCenter For Appli…Texas A&M San Antonio Foundation: $80,000 · EducationTexas A&M San An…SA TALENT INC SA WORKS: $75,000 · EducationSA TALENT INC SA…+3 more: $38,000 · Education+3 moreJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $380,000 · Employment100 BLACK MEN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions: $70,000 · Human ServicesFII - NATIONAL: $50,000 · Human ServicesSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropySan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc: $6,000 · PhilanthropyEMPOWER HOUSE SA: $70,000 · HealthSAY SI: $25,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,483,000Education$708,352Employment$380,000Human Services$200,000Philanthropy$96,000Health$70,000Youth Development$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC: $380,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $310,352 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCenter For Applied Science & Technology Network: $205,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $80,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTexas A&M San Antonio Foundation: $80,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSA TALENT INC SA WORKS: $75,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetEMPOWER HOUSE SA: $70,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions: $70,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAY SI: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrinity University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO EDUCATION FUND DBA SAN ANTONIO EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…John L Santikos Chari…Methodist Healthcare …United Way of San Ant…San Antonio Food BankThe Charles Butt Foun…Spurs GiveThe Texas Cavaliers C…Faye L & William L Co…Communities Foundatio…Foundation for Inspir…Harvey E Najim Charit…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX31.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · San Antonio Food Bank · The Charles Butt Foundation · Spurs Give · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home