Skip to content

· Private foundation

Owen Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$146kRecreation & Sports$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kYouth Development$33kReligion$30kEnvironment$28kHuman Services$27kPublic Benefit$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP COLE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
USC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$5,000
REBUILDING HOLLERS FOUNDATION$3,000
MITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERD'S STAFF$3,000
FURMAN UNIVERSITY$2,500
CONGAREE LAND TRUST$2,200
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,200
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MARYLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI$2,000
SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI$2,000
BROOKGREEN GARDENS$2,000
HAMMOND SCHOOL$1,700
INDIAN WATERS COUNCIL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERD'S STAFF: $7k → 16%MITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERD'S STAFF: $4k → 16%MITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERD'S STAFF: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CO
VA
NC
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 26 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
4

Total granted

$530k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+72%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HAMMOND SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue +44%
  • AO
    AVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +48%
  • NF
    NEIGHBORS FEEDING NEIGHBORS FOOD MI
    5× · 2020–2024 · $24k · revenue +346%

Funded once

  • HH
    Heathwood Hall Episcopal Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +72%
  • PC
    PROJECT CHALLENGE NORTH CAROLINA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -45%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
2
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
3
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
4
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education
7
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
8
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
9
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Cape Henry Collegiate School Inc

We know, value, and challenge each student. we commit to building a diverse and inclusive community. we graduate independent thinkers and globally aware citizens.

Education
12
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asheville School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Belle W Baruch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP COLE: $90,000 · OtherCAMP COLEIndividual grant recipient: $29,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPRUCE PINE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherSPRUCE PINE FIRE DEPARTMENTBELLE W BARUCH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherBELLE W BARUCH FOUNDATIONINDIAN WATERS COUNCIL: $15,500 · OtherINDIAN WATERS COUNCILTRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $15,386 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CATHEDRALTOE RIVER VALLEY WATCH: $14,000 · OtherTOE RIVER VALLEY WATCHTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $13,047 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS FOR THE: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $26,714 · Other+11 moreUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $90,000 · EducationUniversity of South Carolina Educational…HAMMOND SCHOOL: $34,563 · EducationHAMMOND SCHOOLAVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC: $32,500 · EducationAVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INCWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITYASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $7,500 · EducationMITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesMITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERDS STAFF: $14,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS FEEDING NEIGHBORS FOOD MI: $24,000 · Food & NutritionCONGAREE LAND TRUST: $16,200 · EnvironmentBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $5,000 · EnvironmentPARKWAY FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $14,500 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMOUNT GULIAN SOCIETY: $4,100 · Arts & Culture
Other$254,147Education$197,063Human Services$29,500Food & Nutrition$24,000Environment$21,200Public Safety & Disaster$14,500Arts & Culture$10,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHAMMOND SCHOOL: $34,563 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS FEEDING NEIGHBORS FOOD MI: $24,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELLE W BARUCH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONGAREE LAND TRUST: $16,200 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPARKWAY FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $14,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetMITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERDS STAFF: $14,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKGREEN GARDENS: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHeathwood Hall Episcopal School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeless No More Inc: $4,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT GULIAN SOCIETY: $4,100 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT CHALLENGE NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HAMMOND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS FEEDING NEIGHBORS FOOD MI ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BELLE W BARUCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONGAREE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKWAY FIRE AND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL COUNTY SHEPHERDS STAFF ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds BROOKGREEN GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds Heathwood Hall Episcopal School ↗
  • Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT GULIAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TOE RIVER ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Hollers Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FURMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CHALLENGE NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Samuel L Phillips Family Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Owen Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Owen Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Owen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph