· Private foundation
Ovington Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Troop 301 | $21,400 |
| Mario Lemieux Foundation | $6,706 |
| Hollow Oak Land Trust | $5,250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Ryan Douglas Field of the Dreams | $5,000 |
| Rappahannock Senior Center | $3,000 |
| It's About the WarriorOrg | $3,000 |
| Woodstock Fire Department | $2,500 |
| St Paul's School | $2,500 |
| Last Chance Corral | $2,494 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MLMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +100%
- HOHOLLOW OAK LAND TRUST INC6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +69%
- HPHM3 PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE FUND INC3× · 2018–2020 · $32k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- HTHoly Trinity Catholic Churchone grant, 2018 · $12k
- MFMAHARISHI FOUNDATION USA INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -26%
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue ×17
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our organizations mission is to provide access to veterinary medical care for our communitys most vulnerable pets. Hard Luck Animal Welfare Advocates has partnered with the City of Stockton to provide veterinary medical care to community…
To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.
It is the mission of wayne memorial hospital to provide quality healthcare with compassion, advocacy, respect, excellence, and service; to promote wellness in our community; and to be proactive in responding to our community's needs.
UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…
Charlie's kids advocates for safe sleep to prevent infant death.
Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.
Whitley memorial hospital, inc. works to improve the health of our communities and provides quality health services to all who entrust their care to us.
Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.
We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.
Animal Welfare
Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pirates Charities and the most unlike its peers is Last Chance Corral. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOLLOW OAK LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds HM3 PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HANCOCK COUNTY HUMANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAST CHANCE CORRAL ↗
- Who funds AIM WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds ELLIOTT WEST END ATHLETIC ASSN ↗
- Who funds WOODSTOCK FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds PIRATES CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds MAHARISHI FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HAVEN FARM SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds HOLLOWAY PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Zacharys Mission ↗
- Who funds Make-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aetna Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ovington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.