Skip to content
Otts-King Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Otts-King Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$47kHealth$19kPhilanthropy$18kHuman Services$14kInternational$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kCivil Rights$3kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
MISSION ARLINGTON INC$3,000
HEAL PALESTINE INC$2,500
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY$2,500
HEARTLAND ALLIANCE HEALTH$2,500
NEO PHILANTHROPY INC$2,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY$1,000
PANZI FOUNDATION$1,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$1,000
BURKINA FASO STREAMS$1,000
UNBOUND NOW$1,000
NTIBONERA FOUNDATION INC$1,000
ONRAMP INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $1k → 14%TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INC: $5k → 4%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
NM
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 3 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
16

Total granted

$24k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +1%
  • BF
    BURKINA FASO STREAMS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • PT
    PHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +35%
  • SP
    SCHOOL PRAYER CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
2
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
3
Health Services of North Texas Inc

Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…

Health
4
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
5
A Faithful Presence

A faithful presence afp is an organization that provides holistic spiritual care, community building, and trauma-informed advocacy for our formerly homeless neighbors while training other communities to do the same.

Religion
6
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
7
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
8
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
9
Texans for Vaccine Choice

Texans for vaccine choice exists to directly influence vaccine choice public policy and legislation

Health
10
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
11
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tennessee Kids Belong Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION: $25,000 · EducationPHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMI…SCHOOL PRAYER CHALLENGE: $5,000 · OtherSCHOOL PRAYER CHALLENGEMISSION ARLINGTON INC: $3,000 · OtherMISSION ARLINGTON INCCENTRAL INDIA CHRISTIAN MISSION: $3,000 · OtherCENTRAL INDIA CHRISTIAN MIS…LAKE ARLINGTON BAPTIST CHURCH: $2,500 · OtherLAKE ARLINGTON BAPTIST CHUR…ANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH AUSTIN: $2,500 · OtherANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH AU…RELIANCE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · OtherRELIANCE MINISTRIES INCUnion Gospel Mission of Tarrant County: $1,000 · OtherNTIBONERA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food Bank: $1,000 · OtherBURKINA FASO STREAMS: $3,500 · OtherBURKINA FASO STREAMSBE THE BRIDGE: $1,000 · OtherUNBOUND NOW: $1,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND: $1,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS: $12,500 · HealthSOCIETY OF ST VI…HEARTLAND ALLIANCE HEALTH: $2,500 · HealthHEARTLAND ALLIAN…NAMI Texas Inc: $1,000 · HealthNAMI Texas IncTHE ABBA FUND INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE ABBA FUND …TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTENNESSEE KIDS…ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $2,500 · Human ServicesISAIAH 117 HOU…COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOALITION TO S…OnRamp Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesOnRamp IncWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRA…GET UP PROJECT: $2,500 · InternationalGET UP PROJE…HEAL PALESTINE INC: $2,500 · InternationalHEAL PALESTI…PANZI FOUNDATION: $1,000 · InternationalPANZI FOUNDA…MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INT…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRIS…NEO Philanthropy Inc: $8,000 · Public Benefit
Education$25,000Other$27,500Health$16,000Human Services$14,500International$12,000Philanthropy$10,000Public Benefit$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ABBA FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBURKINA FASO STREAMS: $3,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGET UP PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBE THE BRIDGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI Texas Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationAmericares Foundation…Austin Community Foun…Christian Community F…Communities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…ImpactassetsincRaymond James Charita…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Shell USA Company Fou…Renaissance Charitabl…Natl Christian Charit…
Servant FoundationKS14.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Americares Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Otts-King Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Otts-King Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Otts-King Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home