· Private foundation
Otts-King Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MISSION ARLINGTON INC | $3,000 |
| HEAL PALESTINE INC | $2,500 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY | $2,500 |
| HEARTLAND ALLIANCE HEALTH | $2,500 |
| NEO PHILANTHROPY INC | $2,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY | $1,000 |
| PANZI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK | $1,000 |
| BURKINA FASO STREAMS | $1,000 |
| UNBOUND NOW | $1,000 |
| NTIBONERA FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| ONRAMP INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +3%
NEO Philanthropy Inc2× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +1%- BFBURKINA FASO STREAMS2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- PTPHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +35%
- TKTENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
- TATHE ABBA FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.
Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
A faithful presence afp is an organization that provides holistic spiritual care, community building, and trauma-informed advocacy for our formerly homeless neighbors while training other communities to do the same.
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Texans for vaccine choice exists to directly influence vaccine choice public policy and legislation
The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…
She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tennessee Kids Belong Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE KIDS BELONG INC ↗
- Who funds THE ABBA FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds BURKINA FASO STREAMS ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GET UP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds RELIANCE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
- Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds OnRamp Inc ↗
- Who funds PANZI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BE THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds NAMI Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
- Who funds COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Americares Foundation Inc · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Otts-King Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.