Skip to content
Oscar de la Hoya Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Oscar de la Hoya Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$774kEducation$239kYouth Development$120kPhilanthropy$114kInternational$100kPublic Benefit$90kArts & Culture$50kHuman Services$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$129k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL$150,000
VEGAS FORCE FOUNDATION ORG$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORANGE COUNTY HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $20k → 10%COFFEE 4 KIDS HONDURAS INC: $100k → 11%CHAVELYTAS PINK HOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $50k → 14%VEGAS FORCE FOUNDATION ORG: $20k → 13%LA SENDA ANTIGUA MINISTRY: $1k → 14%FERNANDO VARGAS FIGHTING FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%LA PENTECOSTALS: $1k → 14%NEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 13%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD: $50k → 14%SUGAR RAY LEONARD FOUNDATION: $45k → 14%TOAST OUR VETS FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ALHAMBRA-SAN GABRIEL LODGE: $500 → 14%JAMES A GARFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $46k → 14%JAMES A GARFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 14%POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $6k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL: $250k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL: $150k → 14%WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL: $100k → 14%WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $55k → 14%HOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $15k → 14%HOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $10k → 14%HOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $10k → 14%FRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS: $50k → 14%HOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $10k → 14%UTA FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%THE HAROLD & CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $138k → 14%GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $25k → 14%GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $5k → 14%VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF SOCAL: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$933k · 5 repeat orgs$524k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$933k
$504k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-14%

Still filing today

40%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GD
    Green Dot Public Schools
    3× · 2017–2019 · $167k · revenue +55%
  • WM
    White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn
    2× · 2017–2018 · $155k · revenue +105%
  • HP
    HOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL
    4× · 2018–2023 · $45k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • C4
    COFFE 4 KIDS HONDURAS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -72% · 53% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF PASADENA
    one grant, 2020 · $90k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hs Lopez Family Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Hollywood Golf Club Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Sergio and Angela Garcia Foundation
Philanthropy
4
The Suavecito Foundation
Youth Development
5
Felix Gonzalez - Torres Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
The Cortona Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Callejo-Botello Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Fontana Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Pablo Sandoval Family Foundation Inc

At 23, Sandoval used jokes about his weight as a catalyst for teaming with the American Heart Association to urge kids to stay healthy. He spoke in his native language to elementary-school-age kids at San Franciscos predominantly Hispanic…

Human Services
10
Victoria Sousa Foundation
Education
11
Rio Vista Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Hca Healthcare Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc; the most unlike its peers is Uta Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIAL: $500,000 · OtherADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORIALCITY OF PASADENA: $90,000 · OtherCITY OF PASADENAJAMES A GARFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $66,000 · OtherJAMES A GARFIELD HIGH SCHOOL+6 more: $31,575 · OtherWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn: $155,000 · HealthWhite Memorial Med …COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $50,000 · HealthCOLORECTAL CANCER A…SUGAR RAY LEONARD FOUNDATION: $44,700 · HealthSUGAR RAY LEONARD F…THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $20,070 · HealthTHE HAROLD AND CARO…Green Dot Public Schools: $167,000 · EducationGreen Dot Pu…POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $5,950 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentVEGASFORCEFOUNDATIONORG: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFernando Vargas Fighting Foundation: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUTA FOUNDATION: $13,543 · Philanthropy+1 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyCOFFE 4 KIDS HONDURAS INC: $100,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentHISPANIC 100 FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human Services
Other$687,575Health$269,770Education$172,950Youth Development$120,000Philanthropy$116,543International$100,000Environment$50,000Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $167,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn: $155,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOFFE 4 KIDS HONDURAS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOLLENBECK POLICE BUSINESS COUNCIL: $45,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSUGAR RAY LEONARD FOUNDATION: $44,700 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetHISPANIC 100 FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $20,070 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVEGASFORCEFOUNDATIONORG: $20,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetUTA FOUNDATION: $13,543 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $5,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFernando Vargas Fighting Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …The Ahmanson Foundati…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA17.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oscar de la Hoya Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oscar de la Hoya Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Oscar de la Hoya Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Oscar de la Hoya Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oscar de la Hoya’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home