Skip to content
Oregon Primary Care Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oregon Primary Care Association

Leading the transformation of primary care to achieve health equity for all.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$773k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$6.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$191kPublic Benefit$100kHousing & Shelter$75k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $1,424,311, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,490,656 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $66,345 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $187k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.2M
$464,776
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER$772,706
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER$464,776
WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN$114,418
OUTSIDE IN$72,411
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $75k → 14%NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 14 repeat orgs$463k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$6.1M
$463k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+42%

Still filing today

79%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +13%
  • NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +47%
  • ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $732k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SC
    SISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +25%
  • YV
    YAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +31%
  • Central City Concerngraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
2
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
3
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
4
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
5
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
6
Community Health Care

To provide the highest quality health care with compassionate and accessible service for all including comprehensive primary medical, dental and behavioral health care through a clinic system.

Health
7
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
10
Waterfall Clinic Inc

To promote access to quality integrated health services that meet the needs of individuals with barriers to care on the southern oregon coast.

Health
11
Community Health Center of Northeast Oklahoma

We recognize the diversity of the communities we serve and we are guided by our vision and commitment towards providing excellent primary care to our patients and their families. see schedule o for more information.

Health
12
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Umpqua Community Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Cascade Aids Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
20/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $2,344,722 · HealthVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTERNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER: $1,089,915 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTERUMPQUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $249,999 · HealthUMPQUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER+11 more: $443,800 · Health+11 moreONE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $731,908 · OtherONE COMMUNITY HEALTHTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN: $367,610 · OtherTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERNOUTSIDE IN: $274,460 · OtherOUTSIDE INLA CLINICA DEL VALLE FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $260,000 · OtherLA CLINICA DEL VALLE FAMILY HEALTH CARE …SISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $250,000 · OtherSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCMultnomah County Joint Office of Homeless Services: $229,754 · OtherMultnomah County Joint Office of Homeles…CLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS: $141,390 · OtherCLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERSLANE COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $107,000 · Other+2 more: $15,500 · OtherNORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC: $83,500 · Human Services
Health$4,128,436Other$2,377,622Human Services$83,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER: $2,344,722 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER: $1,089,915 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetONE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $731,908 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE WALLACE MEDICAL CONCERN: $367,610 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetOUTSIDE IN: $274,460 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL VALLE FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $260,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSISKIYOU COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $249,999 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $107,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC: $83,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE BIRD CLINIC: $82,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY FARM WORKERS CLINIC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral City Concern: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT: $57,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetADAPT: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINDING WATERS MEDICAL CLINIC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBANDON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $8,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC: $8,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC COMMUNITY HEALTH: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Careoregon IncThe Collins FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…The Ford Family Found…Direct ReliefProvidence Health & S…United Way of the Col…The Roundhouse Founda…Meyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…First Interstate Banc…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR36.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Careoregon Inc · The Collins Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Direct Relief · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · The Roundhouse Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Primary Care Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Primary Care Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Outside in: 33% of income from government
  • White Bird Clinic: 29% of income from government
  • The Wallace Medical Concern: 27% of income from government
  • Adapt: 22% of income from government
  • Bandon Community Health Center: 21% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Health Center: 20% of income from government
  • La Pine Community Health Center: 18% of income from government
  • Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Siskiyou Community Health Center Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Northwest Human Services Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Rogue Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project: 13% of income from government
  • One Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Winding Waters Medical Clinic: 11% of income from government
  • Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center: 11% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Health Center: 9% of income from government
  • Mosaic Community Health: 8% of income from government
  • La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Primary Care Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home