Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oppenheimer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$805kArts & Culture$390kReligion$71kRecreation & Sports$66kFood & Nutrition$64kHuman Services$63kHousing & Shelter$30kEnvironment$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$641k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST$56,500
OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY$11,100
CAPOEIRA EL PASO$10,800
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$6,000
HYDE PARK JAZZ FESTIVAL$5,800
JAZZ INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE CREW$4,000
OJAI MUSIC FESTIVAL$4,000
OJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$4,000
OJAI VALLEY MUSEUM$3,000
OJAI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
OJAI VALLEY TENNIS CLUB$1,500
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DONORS CHOOSE: $25k → 7%OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $25k → 10%FACING HISTORY: $33k → 17%COLEL CHABAD: $18k → 20%CAPOEIRA EL PASO: $11k → 21%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BROWARD: $10k → 13%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $300k → 8%STEPPENWOLF THEATRE: $28k → 14%COMPASSION AND CHOICES: $10k → 10%COLEL CHABAD: $18k → 20%THE PANTRY OF BROWARD: $15k → 13%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $200k → 8%LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $25k → 14%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $38k → 13%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $100k → 8%JAZZ INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $100k → 8%CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10k → 14%CHILDREN & TEACHERS FOUNDATION OF THE CTU: $20k → 14%NEIGHBOR SPACE: $10k → 14%HOT HOUSE: $20k → 14%HER STORY THEATER: $10k → 14%HER STORY THEATER: $10k → 14%HER STORY THEATER: $10k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $135k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $119k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $59k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $57k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $53k → 14%MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $48k → 14%RUBEN SALAZAR BILINGUAL EDUCATION: $25k → 14%HYDE PARK JAZZ FESTIVAL: $15k → 14%CHICAGO JAZZ PHILHARMONIC: $15k → 14%OGDEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $15k → 14%WBEZ: $15k → 14%LAKEVIEW PANTRY: $11k → 14%SOUTH SHORE FINE ARTS ACADEMY: $14k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $25k → 14%RUSH PHILANTHROPY: $25k → 14%RUSH PHILANTHROPY: $25k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $10k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $10k → 14%LIVE THE SPIRIT RESIDENCY: $10k → 14%CHICAGO CHESS FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%HEPH ED: $25k → 14%HOWARD BROWN HEALTH: $12k → 14%MADD RHYTHMS: $10k → 14%GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITARY: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 24 repeat orgs$497k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$1.8M
$476k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

63%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lake Forest College
    4× · 2020–2024 · $700k · revenue +50%
  • LT
    LIVE THE SPIRIT RESIDENCY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +207% · 43% of their budget
  • MS
    MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue ×16

Funded once

  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $38k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $33k
  • CC
    CHICAGO CHESS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
2
Chicago Humanities Festival

To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
3
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
4
Third Coast International Audio Festival

To cultivate a growing international culture of listening.

Arts & Culture
5
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
6
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture
7
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
8
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Cedille Chicago Nfp

Cedille Chicago, NFP is devoted to the activity of producing and marketing recordings of classical music by Chicago-area musicians and composers.

Arts & Culture
10
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
11
Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra

Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra's mission as a professional orchestra is to utilize the universal expression of music to create profound, inspiring, and personal connections between the people and communities of Chicagos Southland.

Arts & Culture
12
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Public Library Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ojai Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $470,615 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $37,500 · OtherCOLEL CHABAD: $36,000 · Other+32 more: $471,200 · Other+32 moreLake Forest College: $700,000 · EducationLake Forest CollegeTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $25,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationLIVE THE SPIRIT RESIDENCY: $105,000 · Arts & CultureLIVE THE SPIRI…MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $56,000 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL O…Jazz Institute of Chicago: $40,000 · Arts & CultureJazz Institute…Hyde Park Jazz Festival: $35,800 · Arts & CultureHyde Park Jazz…STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $27,500 · Arts & CultureSTEPPENWOLF TH…OJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $22,000 · Arts & CultureOJAI FESTIVALS…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO CHESS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsLINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsOJAI VALLEY TENNIS CLUB INC: $7,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $33,500 · Food & NutritionTHE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTHE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY: $31,100 · EnvironmentAID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesEL SISTEMA USA: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$1,065,315Education$730,000Arts & Culture$291,300Recreation & Sports$67,000Food & Nutrition$48,500Environment$31,100Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLake Forest College: $700,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLIVE THE SPIRIT RESIDENCY: $105,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $56,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetJazz Institute of Chicago: $40,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetHyde Park Jazz Festival: $35,800 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $33,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY: $31,100 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetChicago Jazz Philharmonic: $30,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetCHICAGO CHESS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSTEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY: $27,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOJAI FESTIVALS LTD: $22,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $15,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEL SISTEMA USA: $15,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $12,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConcerned Resource & Environmental Workers: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORSPACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BROWARD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOJAI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetOJAI VALLEY TENNIS CLUB INC: $7,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Human Rhythm Project: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
  • Who funds LIVE THE SPIRIT RESIDENCY ↗
  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Jazz Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Hyde Park Jazz Festival ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds THE OJAI VALLEY LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Jazz Philharmonic ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPPENWOLF THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OJAI FESTIVALS LTD ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE PANTRY OF BROWARD INC ↗
  • Who funds AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EL SISTEMA USA ↗
  • Who funds Howard Brown Health Center ↗
  • Who funds Concerned Resource & Environmental Workers ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORSPACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL20.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Richard H Driehaus Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · Walder Foundation · Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · Dr Scholl Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oppenheimer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oppenheimer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Habitat for Humanity of Broward Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oppenheimer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Oppenheimer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oppenheimer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph