Skip to content
Oneten Coalition Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Oneten Coalition Inc

We're driving a skills-first movement to unlock career opportunities for talent without four-year degrees.

$260k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$4.3MEmployment$2.0MPhilanthropy$100kScience & Tech$100kCivil Rights$80kArts & Culture$50kHealth$50kCrime & Legal$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $260,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $250,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$77M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
KY
VA
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
3
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
4
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
6
Code to Work Inc

An employer-led initiative aimed at transforming the hiring process. we use a skills-based approach to identify, train and hire talent. the traditional credentials-based focus must evolve to give all qualified job seekers a chance to prove…

—
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Elevating people by eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
9
Goodwill Industries Inc

Goodwill changes lives and strengthens communities through education, training and work. goodwill strives to increase self sufficiency of its participants through vocational evaluation, training and offering employment opportunities to…

Employment
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
12
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shrm Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is DIVERSENOTE1 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UDACITY INC: $4,130,200 · OtherUDACITY INCMULTIVERSE US INC: $1,533,000 · OtherMULTIVERSE US INC+8 more: $400,000 · Other+8 moreSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $50,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationDURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationTECH IMPACT: $50,000 · EducationCAREERWORKS INC: $50,000 · EducationThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc: $50,000 · EmploymentDIVERSENOTE1 INC: $50,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL NORTH CAR: $50,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT INC: $50,000 · EmploymentINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EmploymentSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $50,000 · EmploymentTECHBRIDGE INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySHRM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyDREAMORG: $50,000 · EnvironmentLove Never Fails Inc: $50,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$6,063,200Education$300,000Employment$300,000Philanthropy$100,000Environment$50,000Crime & Legal$50,000Human Services$30,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDREAMORG: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLove Never Fails Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDIVERSENOTE1 INC: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL NORTH CAR: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTECH IMPACT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTECHBRIDGE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAREERWORKS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSHRM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Truist Foundation IncTides FoundationThe Ayco Charitable F…Silicon Valley Commun…Verizon FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…
Truist Foundation IncFL12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Truist Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oneten Coalition Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oneten Coalition Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Oneten Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home