Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Oneten Coalition Inc

We're driving a skills-first movement to unlock career opportunities for talent without four-year degrees.

$260k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Education$4.3MEmployment$2.0MPhilanthropy$100kScience & Tech$100kCivil Rights$80kArts & Culture$50kHealth$50kCrime & Legal$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $260,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $250,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$77M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
KY
VA
NC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
3
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
4
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
5
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
6
Goodwill Industries of the Valleys Inc

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Employment
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
10
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
11
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
12
Code to Work Inc

An employer-led initiative aimed at transforming the hiring process. we use a skills-based approach to identify, train and hire talent. the traditional credentials-based focus must evolve to give all qualified job seekers a chance to prove…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shrm Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is DIVERSENOTE1 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UDACITY INC — $4,130,200 · OtherUDACITY INCMULTIVERSE US INC — $1,533,000 · OtherMULTIVERSE US INC+8 more — $400,000 · Other+8 moreSKILLS FOR CHICAGO — $50,000 · EmploymentThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $50,000 · EmploymentDIVERSENOTE1 INC — $50,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL NORTH CAR — $50,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT INC — $50,000 · EmploymentINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EmploymentTECH IMPACT — $50,000 · EducationDURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $50,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationCAREERWORKS INC — $50,000 · EducationTECHBRIDGE INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropySHRM FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyLove Never Fails Inc — $50,000 · Crime & LegalDREAMORG — $50,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$6,063,200Employment$300,000Education$300,000Philanthropy$100,000Crime & Legal$50,000Environment$50,000Human Services$30,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSKILLS FOR CHICAGO — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTECH IMPACT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDURHAM TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLove Never Fails Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDIVERSENOTE1 INC — $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMORG — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL NORTH CAR — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAREERWORKS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTECHBRIDGE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHRM FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Truist Foundation IncTides FoundationThe Ayco Charitable F…Silicon Valley Commun…Verizon FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…
Truist Foundation IncFL12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Truist Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oneten Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home