Skip to content
Omalley Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Omalley Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$102kYouth Development$18kRecreation & Sports$16kPhilanthropy$8kScience & Tech$5kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$513k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR TALENTED Y$10,000
YALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AID$10,000
THE OLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 78% of grant dollars ($122k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 22% that went abroad ($35k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE ROWING ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%OLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%GIRLS GOTTA RUN: $1k → 14%YALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AID: $10k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR TALENTED Y: $10k → 11%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%CLAYMAN INSTITUTE AT STANFORD: $5k → 8%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%OLYMPIC CLUB CAMPAIGN FOR KIDS: $2k → 10%NYU SCHOLARSHIPS: $3k → 17%THE CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION: $200 → 14%YALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AID: $10k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR TALENTED Y: $1k → 11%ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%YALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AID: $10k → 12%SFCM PRE-COLLEGE: $2k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $2k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $2k → 10%THE OLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%THE OLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $1k → 10%LOWELL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%FIRST TEE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%LOWELL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%LOWELL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%LOWELL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%GATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOL: $1k → 10%YOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $2k → 10%YOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 22% of all-years giving ($35k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Taiwan$35k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of Omalley Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Omalley Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 6 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
14

Total granted

$62k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+21%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YP
    YALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AID
    3× · 2022–2025 · $30k
  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR TALENTED Y
    2× · 2023–2025 · $11k
  • LA
    Lowell Alumni Association
    4× · 2020–2023 · $9k · revenue -6%

Funded once

  • TF
    TAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • TA
    TAIPEI AMERICAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • EK
    EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +433%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
5
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
6
University of Central Florida Foundation Inc

The ucf foundation encourages, stewards and celebrates charitable contributions from alumni and friends to support university of central florida (ucf).

Education
7
Hkanc Scholarship Foundation

The foundation's sole activity is the awarding of scholarships to undergraduate and graduate university students of high academic distinction. this is based on the belief that investing in today's youth will help to ensure that students…

Philanthropy
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
San Francisco University High School

At san franicisco university high school, we engage our community of diverse voices in a transformational experience that embraces the spirited pursuit of learning and empowers purpose larger than self.

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AID: $30,000 · OtherYALE PARENTS FUND-FINANCIAL AIDTAS FOUNDATION: $17,900 · OtherTAS FOUNDATIONTAIPEI AMERICAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $16,940 · OtherTAIPEI AMERICAN SCHOOL FOUNDATIONJOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR TALENTED Y: $11,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR TALENTED YTHE ROWING ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherTHE ROWING ASSOCIATIONCLAYMAN INSTITUTE AT STANFORD: $5,000 · OtherCLAYMAN INSTITUTE AT STANFORD+4 more: $7,475 · Other+4 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELA…Lowell Alumni Association: $8,500 · EducationLowell Alumni AssociationEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUND…SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $4,000 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUS…New York University: $3,500 · EducationNew York University+1 more: $1,000 · EducationORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $2,100 · PhilanthropySAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE: $2,000 · PhilanthropyOLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 · ReligionYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $200 · Youth Development
Other$93,315Education$47,000Philanthropy$8,100Religion$5,000Recreation & Sports$3,500Youth Development$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLowell Alumni Association: $8,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PETER B TEELEY CHILDRENS CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…Jewish Community Fede…Marin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The San Francisco FoundationCA16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Omalley Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Omalley Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Omalley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home