Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$455k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$320kHealth$277kHuman Services$269kAnimals$84kReligion$66kArts & Culture$60kInternational$59kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$3,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LAURENCE CHURCH$80,000
FRANCISCAN MONASTERY OF THE HOLY LAND$75,000
UKRAINIAN ACTION$35,000
ST LAURENCE CHURCH$30,000
ST LAURENCE CHURCH$25,000
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INTERNATIONAL (PATH)$25,000
ST MARY'S VIABILITY GRANT$24,500
UNDERSTOOD$24,025
ST MARY ADAPTIVE SACREMENT CHAPEL$15,000
ST LAURENCE CHURCH$15,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$10,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART$8,500
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$8,000
ST LAURENCE CHURCH$7,500
PLANO HIGHSCHOOL$5,076
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WIND RUSH FARM: $500 → 10%HEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY: $3k → 6%RIDE FOR JOY THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $250 → 11%EQUUL ACCESS INC: $500 → 7%JACK PINE STABLES: $500 → 10%GALLOP - GIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES: $250 → 13%VICTORY HILL THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $250 → 14%GRACE LAKE MINISTRIES: $500 → 5%INSPIRATION RANCH: $500 → 9%WINGS OF HOPE EQUITHERAPY: $500 → 10%THE SADDLE LIGHT CENTER: $500 → 16%SAVANNAH STATION THERAPEUTIC RIDING PROGRAM: $7k → 9%SUNSET TRP (WHISPERING MANES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER): $9k → 15%GEORGETOWN HARMONY HOMES: $5k → 8%DUTTON FARM: $5k → 8%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $5k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS OF THE MISSOURI VALLEY: $6k → 9%FORWARD STRIDE: $3k → 8%IN STEP WITH HORSES: $500 → 6%BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $3k → 6%EASTERSEALS JOLIET REGION: $5k → 7%DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CENTER OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY INC: $1k → 19%PONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $2k → 7%STAR COMMUNITY INC: $500 → 12%RIDING TO THE TOP THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $3k → 7%PIONEER RESOURCES: $2k → 15%KIDS ON THE GO: $2k → 21%OCCUPAWS GUIDEDOG ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%JEREMIAH'S CROSSING: $500 → 11%MAIN STAY THERAPEUTIC FARM: $500 → 6%IMPACT EQUINE: $2k → 8%ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE PET OWNERS: $1k → 5%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $556 → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $1k → 7%SHARE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 8%TRINITY SERVICES: $890 → 14%GLENKIRK: $334 → 14%EQUINE DREAMS: $38k → 6%EQUINE DREAMS: $38k → 6%HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $945 → 8%EQUINE DREAMS: $25k → 6%EQUINE DREAMS: $1k → 6%ORCHARD VILLAGE: $5k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 14%ORCHARD VILLAGE: $556 → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $445 → 14%PARK LAWN ASSOCIATION INC: $278 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 46%.

Oliver-Hoffmann Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$266k · 14 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
201

Total granted

$266k
$746k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+10%

Still filing today

57%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $389k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ED
    EQUINE DREAMS INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $101k · revenue +114%
  • UA
    Ukrainian Action
    3× · 2022–2025 · $72k · revenue +235%
  • OV
    ORCHARD VILLAGE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN NEUMANN
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -6%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wings of Hope Therapeutic Riding Program Inc
—
2
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
3
Special Equestrians Inc

Special Equestrians provides therapeutic riding programs to individuals with physical, mental, and emotional disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
4
Woodland Strides
Health
5
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
6
Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding Center Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life for anyone with a physical, mental, or emotional disability through therapeutic riding and hippotherapy.

Health
7
Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc

"to heal with horses" by offering nationally accredited, affordable, horse-centered therapies and experiences that bring strength, independence, confidence and joy to central oregonians of all ages and abilities.

Health
8
Hidden Acres Therapeutic Riding Center Inc

To improve the minds, bodies and spirits of children and adults with special needs through the benefits of therapeutic riding and equine assisted activities.

Health
9
Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding of Nw Colorado
—
10
Riding Emphasizing Individual Needs & Strengths

Provide therapeutic horsemanship to disabled individuals.

—
11
Therapeutic Riding Institute Inc

To improve the lives and health of children and adults in southwest Ohio with special physical, cognitive, social and psychological needs through equine assisted services and therapies. TRI partners extensively with community organizations…

—
12
Therapeutic Riding Inc

To provide a therapeutic environment through horseback riding and other activities for people with disabilities or other challenges.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whispering Manes Therapeutic Riding Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whitney Museum of American Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

149 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 149 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
147/149
Grantees still filing
89/149
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LAURENCE CHURCH: $164,060 · OtherST LAURENCE CHURCHST JOHN NEUMANN: $75,000 · OtherST JOHN NEUMANNFRANCISCAN MONASTERY OF THE HOLY LAND: $75,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN MONASTERY OF THE HOLY LANDST VINCENT DE PAUL: $40,000 · Other+113 more: $621,017 · Other+113 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $296,165 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARIT…+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyEQUINE DREAMS INC: $101,001 · Human ServicesEQUINE DREAM…WHISPERING MANES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $9,225 · Human ServicesSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $6,700 · Human Services+34 more: $70,350 · Human Services+34 moreUkrainian Action: $72,000 · InternationalHearts Afire Inc: $5,000 · InternationalENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $8,825 · HealthFoundation for Opthamological Care: $6,500 · HealthHORSES WITH A MISSION INC: $5,000 · HealthON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 · HealthINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthSPECIAL STRIDES INC: $4,381 · HealthHigh & Mighty Therapeutic Riding: $4,307 · HealthWALK ON: $2,770 · HealthEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $2,500 · Health+19 more: $17,529 · HealthTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $5,111 · AnimalsTHE WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsHEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsSAVING PAWS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsLOW COST SPAY-NEUTER CLINIC INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE FIX IS IN INC: $3,600 · AnimalsKENTUCKIANA PUG RESCUE: $3,000 · AnimalsKaruna Horse Rescue Inc: $2,560 · AnimalsRed Door Animal Shelter: $1,500 · AnimalsMedical Mutts Service Dogs Inc: $1,500 · AnimalsAMAZING GRACE EQUINE SANCTUARY INC: $1,488 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · Animals
Other$975,077Philanthropy$306,165Human Services$187,276International$77,000Health$61,812Education$50,500Animals$39,759

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $296,165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUINE DREAMS INC: $101,001 over 3y, 15% of budgetUkrainian Action: $72,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARE Riding Center: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHISPERING MANES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $9,225 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC: $8,825 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLID GROUND EAATC: $8,370 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetINSPIRED ACRES INC: $7,465 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSavannah Station TRP Incorporation: $6,700 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFoundation for Opthamological Care: $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS OF THE MISSOURI VALLEY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetORCHARD VILLAGE: $5,556 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY PET GUARDIANS: $5,111 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHORSES WITH A MISSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF JOLIET REGION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetON MY OWN OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTLAND FARM SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAVING PAWS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLOW COST SPAY-NEUTER CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDUTTON FARM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGeorgetown Harmony Homes: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMacoupin Center for the Developmentally Disabled: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMICHIGAN PET ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSPECIAL STRIDES INC: $4,381 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHigh & Mighty Therapeutic Riding: $4,307 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FIX IS IN INC: $3,600 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKENTUCKIANA PUG RESCUE: $3,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFORWARD STRIDE: $2,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWALK ON: $2,770 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEARTLAND EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING ACADEMY INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKaruna Horse Rescue Inc: $2,560 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIDING TO THE TOP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES: $2,330 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetISLANDS OF BRILLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS ON THE GO: $1,958 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOONRISE THERAPEUTICS: $1,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUINE DREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ukrainian Action ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MARE Riding Center ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHISPERING MANES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds SOLID GROUND EAATC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRED ACRES INC ↗
  • Who funds Savannah Station TRP Incorporation ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Opthamological Care ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Coleman Foundation IncIL30.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Coleman Foundation Inc · Christopher Reeve Foundation · American Quarter Horse Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Dr Scholl Foundation · The Dupage Community Foundation · Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational · Edmond and Alice Opler Foundation · The Latham Foundation for the Promotion of Humane Education · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · Helen V Brach Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Solid Ground Eaatc: 3% of income from government
  • Star Community Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Strides Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mane Stream Inc: 1% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Little Britches Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oliver-Hoffmann’s filings →

More from the funding graph