· Private foundation
Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $96k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $204k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LAURENCE CHURCH | $80,000 |
| FRANCISCAN MONASTERY OF THE HOLY LAND | $75,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ACTION | $35,000 |
| ST LAURENCE CHURCH | $30,000 |
| PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INTERNATIONAL (PATH) | $25,000 |
| ST LAURENCE CHURCH | $25,000 |
| ST MARY'S VIABILITY GRANT | $24,500 |
| UNDERSTOOD | $24,025 |
| ST LAURENCE CHURCH | $15,000 |
| ST MARY ADAPTIVE SACREMENT CHAPEL | $15,000 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $10,000 |
| WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART | $8,500 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $8,000 |
| ST LAURENCE CHURCH | $7,500 |
| PLANO HIGHSCHOOL | $5,076 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 46% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $389k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EDEQUINE DREAMS INC3× · 2020–2023 · $101k · revenue +114%
- UAUkrainian Action3× · 2022–2025 · $72k · revenue +235%
- OVORCHARD VILLAGE2× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- SJST JOHN NEUMANNone grant, 2023 · $75k
- TATHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -6%
- SVST VINCENT DE PAULone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Special Equestrians provides therapeutic riding programs to individuals with physical, mental, and emotional disabilities.
To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.
Dedicated to improving the quality of life for anyone with a physical, mental, or emotional disability through therapeutic riding and hippotherapy.
"to heal with horses" by offering nationally accredited, affordable, horse-centered therapies and experiences that bring strength, independence, confidence and joy to central oregonians of all ages and abilities.
To improve the minds, bodies and spirits of children and adults with special needs through the benefits of therapeutic riding and equine assisted activities.
Provide therapeutic horsemanship to disabled individuals.
To improve the lives and health of children and adults in southwest Ohio with special physical, cognitive, social and psychological needs through equine assisted services and therapies. TRI partners extensively with community organizations…
To provide a therapeutic environment through horseback riding and other activities for people with disabilities or other challenges.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whispering Manes Therapeutic Riding Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Whitney Museum of American Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
149 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 149 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds EQUINE DREAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Action ↗
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds MARE Riding Center ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds BELLARMINE JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds DEKALB COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHISPERING MANES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds SOLID GROUND EAATC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRED ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds Savannah Station TRP Incorporation ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Opthamological Care ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Coleman Foundation Inc · Christopher Reeve Foundation · American Quarter Horse Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Dr Scholl Foundation · The Dupage Community Foundation · Professional Association of Therapeutic Horsemanship Inernational · Edmond and Alice Opler Foundation · The Latham Foundation for the Promotion of Humane Education · Community Foundation of the Fox River Valley · Helen V Brach Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Solid Ground Eaatc — 3% of income from government
- Star Community Inc — 2% of income from government
- Special Strides Inc — 2% of income from government
- Mane Stream Inc — 1% of income from government
- High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc — 0% of income from government
- Little Britches Therapeutic Riding Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Oliver-Hoffmann Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.