Skip to content

· Private foundation

O'Kane Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$430kInternational$186kArts & Culture$136kHousing & Shelter$80kHealth$80kFood & Nutrition$25kEnvironment$20kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $215k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KAKENYA'S DREAM$30,000
VA FOUNDATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES$30,000
WOMEN'S CENTER$15,000
TEAM IMPACT$15,000
SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION$15,000
SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT$15,000
JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
WOLFTRAP FOUNDATION$15,000
OPERATOR RELIEF FUND$10,000
CORNERSTONES$10,000
ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER$10,000
SKAGIT LAND TRUST$10,000
MERCERSBURG ACADEMY$10,000
HELPING CHILDREN WORLDWIDE$1,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CORNERSTONES: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$937k · 18 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$937k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+14%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $180k · revenue +512%
  • WT
    WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    5× · 2019–2024 · $75k · revenue +10%
  • TW
    The Women's Center
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • ER
    ENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • VF
    VA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
2
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
3
The Sophia Way

The sophia way is a place of hope and change for women. we support them on their journey from homelessness to safe and stable living.

Human Services
4
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
5
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
6
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
7
Women Doing Well Inc

Women doing well exists to activate women towards greater purposeful generosity. this is accomplished by taking women through the women doing well pathway where they will learn their purpose, identify their passions, and create a plan to…

Education
8
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
11
Women's Community Clinic

The mission of the women's community clinic is to improve the health and well-being of women and girls. we believe preventive, educational care is essential to lifelong health and that all women deserve excellent health care, regardless of…

—
12
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operator Relief Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LANGLEY SCHOOL CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $200,000 · OtherLANGLEY SCHOOL CAPITAL CAMPAIGNLANGLEY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $80,500 · OtherLANGLEY SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER: $61,000 · OtherJOHN F KENNEDY CENTERVA FOUNDATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $47,000 · OtherVA FOUNDATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGESMINDS INCORPORATED: $40,000 · OtherMINDS INCORPORATEDFLINT HILL SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $30,000 · OtherMERCERSBURG ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherThe Women's Center: $25,000 · OtherSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherSOME INC: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $53,200 · Other+6 moreKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $180,000 · EducationKAKENYA CENTER FOR E…WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $75,000 · Arts & CultureANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterInterfaith Coalition of Whatcom County: $30,000 · HealthOPERATOR RELIEF FUND INC: $10,000 · HealthSKAGIT LAND TRUST: $20,000 · EnvironmentTEAM IMPACT INC: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$616,700Education$180,000Arts & Culture$75,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Health$40,000Environment$20,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE: $180,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS INCORPORATED: $40,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetANACORTES FAMILY CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetInterfaith Coalition of Whatcom County: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Women's Center: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOME INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKAGIT LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTEAM IMPACT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPERATOR RELIEF FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHelping Children Worldwide Inc: $6,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MINDS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ANACORTES FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Coalition of Whatcom County ↗
  • Who funds The Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SKAGIT LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TEAM IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGEDI REFUGE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds OPERATOR RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds Helping Children Worldwide Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O'Kane Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O'Kane Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to O'Kane Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to O'Kane Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O'Kane Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph