Skip to content

· Private foundation

O'Connell Private Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2021
15
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Housing & Shelter$76kRecreation & Sports$23kReligion$15kCivil Rights$8kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2021 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k14 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAR HOUSE$20,500
LEVITY PROJECT QUITO$2,515
RECREATION UNLIMITED$2,400
FLYING HORSE FARMS$1,500
BALLET MET$1,500
MID OHIO FOOD BANK$1,500
DOMINICAN SISTERS$1,500
BISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL$1,500
HEART TO HEART$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
ST URSULA ACADEMY$1,000
DAVID'S EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY FD$750
SISTERS OF LIFE$500
Individual grant recipient$250
KIAWAH CONSERVANCY$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
OH
VA
MD
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$145k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-7%

Still filing today

36%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    STAR HOUSE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $76k · revenue +306%
  • FH
    FLYING HORSE FARMS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $9k · revenue +31%
  • BM
    BALLET METROPOLITAN INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -98%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • CM
    COLUMBUS METRO LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
2
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
3
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
4
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Ohio Capital Finance Corporation

Ohio capital finance corporation provides flexible financing products and utilizes partnerships for the expansion and preservation of afforable housing to advance community development while ensuring that all residents regardless of income…

Community Improvement
8
Nationwide Childrens Hospital Group Return

Nationwide children's hospital's mission is committed to best outcomes and health equity for all children, ensuring every child has access to the best care regardless of their ability to pay. upon this fundamental belief, nch is committed…

—
9
Emory University

Emory University's mission is to create, preserve, teach, and apply knowledge in the service of humanity. (See Schedule O for continuation)

Education
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
12
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Flying Horse Farms; the most unlike its peers is The Center for Working Families Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STAR HOUSE: $76,250 · PhilanthropySTAR HOUSERECREATION UNLIMITED: $14,700 · OtherRECREATION UNLIMITEDLEVITY PROJECT QUITO: $7,515 · OtherLEVITY PROJECT QUITODOMINICAN SISTERS: $7,500 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERSMid-Ohio Foodbank: $7,500 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankBISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL: $7,000 · OtherBISHOPS ANNUAL APPEALHEART TO HEART: $4,000 · OtherHEART TO HEARTSISTERS OF LIFE: $2,500 · OtherST CHARLES PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $2,250 · Other+18 more: $9,750 · Other+18 moreFLYING HORSE FARMS: $8,500 · Recreation & SportsBALLET METROPOLITAN INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · EmploymentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $250 · Human ServicesDAVIDS EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $750 · International
Philanthropy$76,250Other$62,715Recreation & Sports$8,500Arts & Culture$7,500Employment$5,000Human Services$1,250International$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAR HOUSE: $76,250 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFLYING HORSE FARMS: $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET METROPOLITAN INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIDS EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $750 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STAR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds BALLET METROPOLITAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds DAVIDS EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds GLADDEN COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds The Kiawah Island Natural Habitat Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEXLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O'Connell Private Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O'Connell Private Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O'Connell Private Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph