Skip to content

· Private foundation

O'Bryan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$942kAnimals$666kFood & Nutrition$404kCivil Rights$390kHealth$383kPublic Benefit$167kCrime & Legal$114kEducation$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$27,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER$50,000
PRO-LIFE ACTION LEAGUE$40,000
EAST TROY FOOD PANTRY INC$27,000
MUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY$27,000
RELEVANT RADIO$5,000
WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAZARUS HOUSE: $26k → 8%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND: $20k → 14%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND: $20k → 14%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND: $15k → 14%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND: $5k → 14%LAZARUS HOUSE: $1k → 8%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND: $2k → 14%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
NY
OR
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 24 repeat orgs$536k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
19

Total granted

$2.7M
$536k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+43%

Still filing today

58%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $514k · revenue +81%
  • ET
    EAST TROY FOOD PANTRY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $161k · revenue +28% · 60% of their budget
  • AF
    ANA'S FRIENDS INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $114k · revenue +261%

Funded once

  • NP
    NATIONAL PERSONHOOD ALLIANCE EDUCATIONAL TRUST FUN
    one grant, 2021 · $140k
  • NP
    NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CL
    CHERISH LIFE IRELAND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caring Network Nfp

To honor and glorify jesus christ, the author and creator of life, by bringing his love and compassion to abortion-minded women and equipping them to choose life - both physical and spiritual.

Health
2
Pregnancy Support Center of Carroll County Inc

To provide pregnancy support, medical information, pregnancy testing, limited obstetrical ultrasound, and parenting instruction for individuals confronted with an unexpected pregnancy. Our care for women is given, all to the Glory of God!

Human Services
3
Indiana Right to Life Incorporated

To educate the public about abortion

—
4
Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

To share the truth and compassion of jesus christ, support life-affirming choices and promote healthy relationships by serving and caring for women and families in pregnancy-related circumstances

—
5
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

—
6
Catholics for Choice

Catholics for Choice - which serves the pro-choice Catholic majority - encounters, educates, and emboldens people of faith who support reproductive freedom. Catholics for Choice believes healthcare is a human right and that includes access…

Civil Rights
7
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
8
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health
9
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
10
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
11
Women's Care Center Inc

Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.

Health
12
Paws and Prayers Inc

None

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Illinois Shorthair Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

National Personhood Alliance Educational Trust Fund: $240,000 · OtherNational Personhood Alliance Educational Trust FundGENTLEMEN OF THE ROUNDTABLE: $165,000 · OtherGENTLEMEN OF THE ROUNDTABLEEAST TROY FOOD PANTRY INC: $160,500 · OtherEAST TROY FOOD PANTRY INCFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GENEVA: $146,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GENEVANATIONAL PERSONHOOD ALLIANCE EDUCATIONAL TRUST FUN: $140,000 · OtherNATIONAL PERSONHOOD ALLIANCE EDUCATIONAL TRUST FUNANA'S FRIENDS INC: $114,000 · OtherANA'S FRIENDS INCSOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART UNITED STATES CANADA PROVINCE INC: $114,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART UNITED STATES CANADA PROVINCE I…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $100,000 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI PARISH OF TODD COUNTY KY: $95,000 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI PARISH OF TODD COUNTY KYSAINT STEPHEN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $70,000 · OtherMISSIONARY SERVANTS OF THE MOST HOLY TRINITY: $60,000 · OtherCHERISH LIFE IRELAND INC: $60,000 · Other+12 more: $262,100 · Other+12 moreANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER: $514,000 · AnimalsANDERSON ANIMAL SHEL…DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $63,000 · AnimalsDEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL…+3 more: $28,900 · AnimalsSave the Storks: $105,000 · HealthSave the …OVARIAN CANCER SYMPTOM AWARENESS ORGANIZATION: $90,000 · HealthOVARIAN C…JOHN PAUL II MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $77,500 · HealthJOHN PAUL…CAREIN CONNECTIONS UNLIMITED NFP: $10,000 · HealthMUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY: $176,500 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $25,000 · Food & NutritionWOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND INC: $64,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesLAZARUS HOUSE: $27,000 · Human ServicesPRO-LIFE ACTION LEAGUE INC: $150,266 · Civil RightsIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $83,931 · ReligionSOPHIA INSTITUTE: $40,000 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $6,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · Religion
Other$1,726,600Animals$605,900Health$282,500Food & Nutrition$231,500Human Services$151,000Civil Rights$150,266Religion$130,931

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER: $514,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetNational Personhood Alliance Educational Trust Fund: $240,000 over 3y, 61% of budgetMUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY: $176,500 over 9y, 14% of budgetEAST TROY FOOD PANTRY INC: $160,500 over 8y, 60% of budgetPRO-LIFE ACTION LEAGUE INC: $150,266 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetANA'S FRIENDS INC: $114,000 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetSave the Storks: $105,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOVARIAN CANCER SYMPTOM AWARENESS ORGANIZATION: $90,000 over 5y, 46% of budgetIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $83,931 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN PAUL II MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $77,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetWOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND INC: $64,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetDEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $63,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOPHIA INSTITUTE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE: $27,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Retriever Rescue of Southwest Florida Inc: $19,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAREIN CONNECTIONS UNLIMITED NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United Way of Lee County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBichon and Little Buddies Rescue Inc: $4,900 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds National Personhood Alliance Educational Trust Fund ↗
  • Who funds MUKWONAGO FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds EAST TROY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO-LIFE ACTION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANA'S FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Save the Storks ↗
  • Who funds OVARIAN CANCER SYMPTOM AWARENESS ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN PAUL II MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER CHICAGOLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds DEKALB COUNTY ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Golden Retriever Rescue of Southwest Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREIN CONNECTIONS UNLIMITED NFP ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds The United Way of Lee County Inc ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS SHORTHAIR RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O'Bryan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O'Bryan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to O'Bryan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to O'Bryan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on O'Bryan’s filings →

More from the funding graph