Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nydick Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$369kReligion$105kHealth$95kHousing & Shelter$48kEmployment$20kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $89k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER DUBLIN LUTHERAN CHURCH$29,449
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$25,000
ST PETERS SCHOOL$20,000
LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
INSPIRITEC$2,500
ACT II PLAYHOUSE$1,000
WISSAHICKON VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
LOU FERRARO GOLF CLASSIC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTCO SAAC: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Nydick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nydick Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$627k · 15 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$627k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+51%

Still filing today

73%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +7%
  • LM
    LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +103%
  • PU
    PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SI
    SQUASHSMARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +51%
  • TF
    THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +246%
  • OC
    OCEAN CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
4
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
7
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
8
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
9
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc. ("tjuh") is dedicated to improving the health of the communities we serve. we are committed to: 1) setting the standard for excellence in the delivery of patient care, patient safety and the…

Health
10
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
11
Jefferson Health - Northeast

To provide exceptional patient care and customer service to members of the communities served by the hospitals, and to recognize a patient's right to considerate and respectful care, regardless of ability to pay. please refer to schedule o…

Health
12
Whyy Inc

Whyy is the philadelphia region's leading public media provider, serving southeastern pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and all of delaware.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Squashsmarts Inc; the most unlike its peers is The First Tee of Greater Philadelphia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
15/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $225,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $55,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITYINSPIRITEC INC: $20,000 · EducationINSPIRITEC INCTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $15,250 · Education+3 more: $7,700 · EducationUPPER DUBLIN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $104,901 · OtherUPPER DUBLIN LUTHERAN CHURCHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $47,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $45,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PETER'S SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherST PETER'S SCHOOL+3 more: $2,750 · OtherLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $95,000 · HealthLANKENAU MEDICAL…ACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD: $4,700 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,300 · AnimalsSQUASHSMARTS INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $500 · Recreation & SportsSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO: $250 · Human Services
Education$322,950Other$220,651Health$95,000Arts & Culture$7,700Animals$1,300Recreation & Sports$1,000Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $95,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRITEC INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST PETER'S SCHOOL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $15,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD: $4,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION: $3,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISSAHICKON VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $1,950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRITEC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PETER'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds WISSAHICKON VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds BUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nydick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nydick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nydick Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph