Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nydick Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$369kReligion$105kHealth$95kHousing & Shelter$48kEmployment$20kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $89k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER DUBLIN LUTHERAN CHURCH$29,449
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$25,000
ST PETERS SCHOOL$20,000
LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$5,000
INSPIRITEC$2,500
ACT II PLAYHOUSE$1,000
WISSAHICKON VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
LOU FERRARO GOLF CLASSIC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MONTCO SAAC: $250 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Nydick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Nydick Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$627k · 15 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$627k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+51%

Still filing today

73%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +7%
  • LM
    LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +103%
  • PU
    PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SI
    SQUASHSMARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +51%
  • TF
    THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +246%
  • OC
    OCEAN CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Springside Chestnut Hill Academy

See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…

Education
4
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
7
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
8
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

9
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc. ("tjuh") is dedicated to improving the health of the communities we serve. we are committed to: 1) setting the standard for excellence in the delivery of patient care, patient safety and the…

Health
10
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
11
Jefferson Health - Northeast

To provide exceptional patient care and customer service to members of the communities served by the hospitals, and to recognize a patient's right to considerate and respectful care, regardless of ability to pay. please refer to schedule o…

Health
12
Whyy Inc

Whyy is the philadelphia region's leading public media provider, serving southeastern pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and all of delaware.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Squashsmarts Inc and the most unlike its peers is The First Tee of Greater Philadelphia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
15/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $225,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY — $55,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITYINSPIRITEC INC — $20,000 · EducationINSPIRITEC INCTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $15,250 · Education+3 more — $7,700 · EducationUPPER DUBLIN LUTHERAN CHURCH — $104,901 · OtherUPPER DUBLIN LUTHERAN CHURCHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $47,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient — $45,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PETER'S SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherST PETER'S SCHOOL+3 more — $2,750 · OtherLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $95,000 · HealthLANKENAU MEDICAL…ACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD — $4,700 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $3,000 · Arts & CultureBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,300 · AnimalsSQUASHSMARTS INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO — $250 · Human Services
Education$322,950Other$220,651Health$95,000Arts & Culture$7,700Animals$1,300Recreation & Sports$1,000Human Services$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $225,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY — $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRITEC INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST PETER'S SCHOOL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $15,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD — $4,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION — $3,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISSAHICKON VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $1,950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds INSPIRITEC INC
  • Who funds ST PETER'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD
  • Who funds HOPE PARTNERSHIP FOR EDUCATION
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds WISSAHICKON VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds BUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA INC
  • Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nydick Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph