· Public charity
Ny Nanum Foundation Inc
To support community based programs
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k6 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEIGHBOR PLUS | $30,800 |
| GIVE CHANCES | $13,200 |
| CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT | $10,000 |
| KOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
| DAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY INCLUSION & DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| ENOB | $2,000 |
| NY NANOOM HOUSE | $1,000 |
| JESUS LOVE HOUSE | $1,000 |
| QUEENS DREAM CENTER | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKThe Korean American Family Service Center Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $50k · revenue +90%
- GCGIVE CHANCES INC3× · 2018–2020 · $36k · revenue +203%
- CICOMMUNITY INCLUSION AND DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue ×13
Funded once
- EHESTHER HA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +3%
- TKTHE KOREAN-AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORKINCone grant, 2017 · $13k · 29% of their budget
- CACommittee Against Anti-Asian Violence Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +116%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…
Helping south korean immigrants to settle down in the greater new york area as korean-american citizens and promote activities for unity and healthy social relationships.
We advocate for the rights of Korean-american and promote the well-being and prosperity of the Korean-American community. We conduct activities to promote unity and fellowship, community participation, provide educational and social…
To support and assist members of the korean community to be healthy and productive individuals.
To exercise and protect the privileges and interest of the residents of Korean-American community in the New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Tri-State area to foster a healty interest in the civic affaires of the community.
To enhance korean-american rights and to do charitable & fraternal activities in the state of new jersey.
Korean community development services centers (kcdsc) mission is to provide the members of our community with support services that they need to achieve personal growth and pursue community growth. kcdsc also provides services to…
To raise funds and conduct work that supports the creation of a Koren Community Center that provides services and cultural opportunities that allow Korean and non-Koreans to develop as healthy, self-sufficient , and engaged community…
To serve korean families with disabled children who are unable to take full advantage of available local, state and federal services by helping these families to overcome language and informational barriers.
Helping south korean immigrants to settle down in the state of connecticut as korean-american citizens and promoting activities for unity and healthy social relationship as such.
The kaca is organized exclusively for educational and charitable purposes, as defined by section 501 (c) (3) of the internal revenue code. the main objective is to spread good will between korea and usa thru various cultural concert events…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Grace Seniors Inc Dba Korean Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Queens Dream Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Korean American Family Service Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GIVE CHANCES INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INCLUSION AND DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds DAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK CLASSICAL PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds KOREAN-AMERICAN YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds ENOB INC ↗
- Who funds New Beginning for Special Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN CIVIC EMPOWERMENT FOR COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds JESUS LOVE HOUSE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds QUEENS DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ESTHER HA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KOREAN-AMERICAN SENIOR CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORKINC ↗
- Who funds GMA AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GRACE SENIORS INC DBA KOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds KOREAN LANGUAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KOREANAMERICANSTORYORG INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Korean-American Community Foundation Inc · Csk Charitable Foundation · Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Grace Charity Foundation Inc · Asian American Federation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ny Nanum Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Give Chances Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ny Nanum Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ny Nanum Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.