· Private foundation
Csk Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k45 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $51k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICA KOREA UNITED SOCITY | $52,200 |
| FAMILY TOUCH | $11,000 |
| ONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| NY NANUM FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MIWON PEACH PRIZE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MILAL MISSION OF NJ | $10,000 |
| THE KOREAN ASSOICATION OF GREATER | $7,600 |
| HOW MISSION CHURCH | $7,000 |
| KOREAN AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ABBY MISSION | $5,000 |
| BELLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| ASSOC FOR US ALUMI OF UNIVERSITY | $3,000 |
| USLEC | $2,750 |
| GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KHKYUNG HEE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2022 · $22k · revenue +60%
- KYKOREAN-AMERICAN YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC6× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +24%
- TKThe Korean American Family Service Center Inc5× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- GCGLORY CHURCH OF JESUS CHRISTone grant, 2022 · $20k
- AKAMERICA KOREA UNITED SOCIETY INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -9%
- UHUNIVERSITY HS - NORTH BERGEN HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $19k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of korean culture center of new york, inc. is to promote and organize korean cultural, arts, educational, and social activities. it aims to establish a venue where all korean americans and other groups can participate in…
Comparative studies and research concerning the political, economic, social, and cultural barriers and ties among the usa,south korea and north korea.
To spread the gospel to the underserved countries
To exercise and protect the privileges and interest of the residents of Korean-American community in the New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Tri-State area to foster a healty interest in the civic affaires of the community.
To enhance the mutual relationship & corporation between korean schools in america to help improve quality of korean language and culture education & expand the base thereof. to help promte pride of descendants of koreans & establish…
Strengthening the bonds of awareness, understanding & cooperation between the us & korea.
Serving community with scholarship and enhance workmanship among medical practitioners.
Our mission is to provide an encouraging environment to learn, discover and experience the korean language and its rich culture.
King sejong institue center, u.s.a. is an educational organization created to promote korean language and culture in the united states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Korean American Scholarship Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bella Music Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 192 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY TOUCH INC ↗
- Who funds NY NANUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KYUNG HEE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA KOREA UNITED SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds KOREAN-AMERICAN YOUTH ASSISTANCE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds MIWON PEACE PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAVIOR MISSION PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds ONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds The Korean American Family Service Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENOB INC ↗
- Who funds BELLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KOREAN AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Judith Ehm Foundation · Ny Nanum Foundation Inc · Chon Family Foundation Inc · Joh Foundation Inc · Korean-American Community Foundation Inc · The Grace and Mercy Foundation Inc · Dow Kim Family Foundation · Fa Park Family Foundation Inc · Yt Hwang Family Foundation Inc · Nae Il Foundation Ltd · Grace Charity Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Csk Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Western New England University — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Csk Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Csk Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.