Skip to content
Northwood Woman's Club Charitable Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Northwood Woman's Club Charitable Fund

To foster interest and participation helping to meet the philanthropic needs of our community and to stimulate the intellectual, cultural and social development of its members.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$562kEducation$440kHealth$403kHousing & Shelter$262kCrime & Legal$216kYouth Development$166kReligion$58kCivil Rights$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $162,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $170,528 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,528 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $124k
$62,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE$62,000
FAMILY COMPASS$62,000
ALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH$27,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $448k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REFRESH NORTH TEXAS: $30k → 8%MANEGAIT: $30k → 5%MOMMIES IN NEED: $50k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $10k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $36k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $37k → 14%MOMMIES IN NEED: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $25k → 14%HOPE COTTAGE: $53k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $40k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES: $58k → 14%NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$750k · 7 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
26

Total granted

$750k
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+9%

Still filing today

71%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER AND COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $291k · revenue +403%
  • NF
    NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE
    2× · 2022–2025 · $111k · revenue +9%
  • MI
    MOMMIES IN NEED
    2× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • DA
    Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $63k · revenue -27%
  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $62k · revenue +6%
  • BE
    BONTON ENTERPRISESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $62k · revenue +535%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
2
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
3
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—
4
Dallas County Family Resource Center

The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…

Human Services
5
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
6
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
7
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
8
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

—
9
Operation Care International Inc

Operation care international exists to glorify god. in obedience to his will, we connect impoverished children and the homeless to jesus christ providing for their physical needs through god's provision both at home and abroad.

Human Services
10
Frisco Family Services Center

Help members of our communities who are facing hunger, homelessness, and other urgent needs improve their quality of life and achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
12
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Attitudes & Attire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc: $63,333 · OtherDallas Area Habitat for …UGM OF DALLAS: $58,333 · OtherUGM OF DALLASOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $57,800 · OtherOUR FRIENDS PLACETHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH: $56,550 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS …CRISTO REY DALLAS: $47,000 · OtherCRISTO REY DALLASAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $42,800 · OtherAUSTIN STREET CENTERST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL: $32,000 · OtherST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOLFRIENDS OF WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $32,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WEDNESDAY'S C…Attitudes & Attire: $31,500 · OtherAttitudes & AttireALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $27,000 · OtherALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACHEMILY'S PLACE INC: $22,000 · OtherMOMMIES IN NEED: $100,000 · Human ServicesMOMMIES IN NEEDNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $67,800 · Human ServicesNORTH DALLAS SHARED MI…HOPE COTTAGE INC: $53,333 · Human ServicesHOPE COTTAGE INCMETROCREST SERVICES: $40,000 · Human ServicesMETROCREST SERVICESLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $37,348 · Human ServicesLIFESAVERS FOUNDATIONINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $36,000 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH FAMILY SERV…Mane Gait: $30,000 · Human ServicesMane GaitREFRESH FRISCO: $30,000 · Human ServicesREFRESH FRISCOCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $24,687 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVI…HOPE SUPPLY CO: $18,683 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER AND COMMUNICATION DISORDERS: $290,500 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR THE …OPEN ARMS INC BRYANS HOUSE: $75,333 · HealthOPEN ARMS INC BRYAN…+1 more: $12,130 · HealthCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $286,713 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDAT…THE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATI…Youth With Faces: $40,000 · PhilanthropyYouth With FacesNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $111,374 · Crime & LegalFAMILY COMPASS: $62,000 · Crime & LegalPROMISE HOUSE INC: $52,800 · Housing & ShelterSHARED HOUSING CENTER INC: $47,800 · Housing & ShelterDALLAS MISSION FOR LIFE Doing business as Dallas Life: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $62,053 · Civil RightsDALLAS CASA: $50,000 · Civil RightsBONTON ENTERPRISES: $62,000 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $48,683 · Education
Other$470,316Human Services$447,851Health$377,963Philanthropy$376,713Crime & Legal$173,374Housing & Shelter$140,600Civil Rights$112,053Education$110,683

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER AND COMMUNICATION DISORDERS: $290,500 over 2y, 23% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $286,713 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $111,374 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMOMMIES IN NEED: $100,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetOPEN ARMS INC BRYANS HOUSE: $75,333 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC: $67,800 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetDallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc: $63,333 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $62,053 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBONTON ENTERPRISES: $62,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $57,800 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetHOPE COTTAGE INC: $53,333 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $52,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDALLAS CASA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $48,683 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSHARED HOUSING CENTER INC: $47,800 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $42,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS MISSION FOR LIFE Doing business as Dallas Life: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMETROCREST SERVICES: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYouth With Faces: $40,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $37,348 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $36,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL: $32,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF WEDNESDAY'S CHILD: $32,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetAttitudes & Attire: $31,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMane Gait: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetREFRESH FRISCO: $30,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $24,687 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $18,683 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $12,130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…United Way of Metropo…Hillcrest FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…Texas Instruments Fou…The Moody FoundationW P & Bulah Luse Foun…The Rees-Jones Founda…Chi Omega Education a…Katherine C Carmody C…Hattie Mae Lesley Fou…
The Dallas FoundationTX43.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Moody Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Chi Omega Education and Charity Fund of Dallas · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · Hattie Mae Lesley Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northwood Woman's Club Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northwood Woman's Club Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northwood Woman's Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home