Skip to content
Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview at a glance

· Private foundation

Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$137kFood & Nutrition$79kPhilanthropy$77kAnimals$65kEnvironment$42kArts & Culture$40kHealth$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILVER STAR SEARCH AND RESCUE$10,000
COLUMBIA LAND TRUST$10,000
SW WA GAP FOUNDATION$10,000
PORT OF CAMAS-WASHOUGAL$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SW WASHINGTON$10,000
FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON$10,000
WASHOUGAL SOCIETY FOR ADVANCEMENT$10,000
SW WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ZION LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Inter-Faith Treasure House: $10k → 9%INTER-FAITH TREASURE HOUSE: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$472k · 16 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +115% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$472k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+43%

Still filing today

63%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    EVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue ×17
  • SHARE
    4× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +115%
  • VH
    VANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    4× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL HEALTH SW WA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • WA
    WATERSHED ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • WS
    WASHOUGAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Skagit Valley Hospitality House Association

To reflect the heart of God by feeding, sheltering, clothing, healing and empowering those in need. Programs include housing, a cafe and job training system, shelter resources, and more. Our core values are: compassion, respect, joy and…

Housing & Shelter
2
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
3
Columbia River Mental Health Services

Columbia river mental health services is a full service mental health agency offering a wide spectrum of behavioral health services to children and adults of clark county, washington.

Health
4
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
5
Clatsop Community Action

Clatsop community action, inc. (cca) is an oregon nonprofit corporation whose mission is to assist low-income individuals and families meet housing, energy, food and other basic living needs in the clatsop county area of oregon. cca…

—
6
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
7
Columbia Humane Society

To assist the community in the successful rehoming (and training) of adoptable animals.

Animals
8
Solid Ground Washington

At Solid Ground, we work passionately to end poverty and build a more equitable community. Our services support people experiencing poverty by helping them achieve stability and expand their skills to realize their dreams. And that's just…

Housing & Shelter
9
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Housing Fund

The community housing fund secures new sources of capital and makes those funds available in the form of flexible loans to community partners who create and preserve equitable and affordable homes and related community facilities in…

Housing & Shelter
11
Central Washington Health Services Association

Local care by and for our community.

Health
12
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Sw Washington; the most unlike its peers is Bridge the Gap Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $49,500 · OtherEVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITYIndividual grant recipient: $47,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHARE: $37,500 · OtherSHARECLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $34,500 · OtherCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANKSWWA GAP FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherSWWA GAP FOUNDATIONSILVER STAR SEARCH & RESCUE: $30,000 · OtherSILVER STAR SEARCH & RESCUEPORT OF CAMAS-WASHOUGAL: $20,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SW WA: $19,500 · Other+13 more: $121,650 · Other+13 moreCommunity Foundation for SW Washington: $66,500 · PhilanthropyCommunity F…VANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $36,500 · AnimalsVANCOUVER H…WEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $28,000 · AnimalsWEST COLUMB…COUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS: $29,500 · Housing & ShelterSECOND STEP HOUSING: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $32,000 · EnvironmentFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $30,000 · HealthInter-Faith Treasure House: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$390,250Philanthropy$66,500Animals$64,500Housing & Shelter$49,500Environment$32,000Health$30,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Foundation for SW Washington: $66,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $49,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSHARE: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $36,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK: $34,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $32,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS: $29,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $28,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSECOND STEP HOUSING: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetVANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC RESERVE TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGE THE GAP MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $9,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHOUGAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Community Foundation for SW Washington ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds SHARE ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER HUMANE SOCIETY AND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds WEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SECOND STEP HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds Inter-Faith Treasure House ↗
  • Who funds VANCOUVER NATIONAL HISTORIC RESERVE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE THE GAP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHOUGAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Firstenburg Found…Columbia Community Cr…Umpqua Bank Charitabl…M J Murdock Charitabl…Beaches Summertime Cr…Kind Heart Free Spiri…Anna C Macaskill Schw…The Honorable Frank L…Southwest Washington …PeaceHealthMarie Lamfrom Charita…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
The Firstenburg FoundationWA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Firstenburg Foundation · Columbia Community Credit Union · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Beaches Summertime Cruisin' · Kind Heart Free Spirit Foundation · Anna C Macaskill Schwab and Dwight L Schwab · The Honorable Frank L & Arlene G Price Foundation · Southwest Washington Regional Health Alliance · PeaceHealth · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview?

    Find your warmest path to Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home