· Private foundation
Kind Heart Free Spirit Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HIGH DESERT MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| COLUMBIA LAND TRUST | $20,000 |
| HAWAII LAND TRUST | $20,000 |
| COLUMBIA PLAY PROJECT | $10,000 |
| OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SHARE | $10,000 |
| INTER-FAITH TREASURE HOUSE | $5,000 |
| WOMEN HELPING WOMEN | $5,000 |
| MAUI FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| SOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| GROWING GARDENS | $5,000 |
| LA CENTER ARTS COUNCIL | $5,000 |
| MOBIUS DISCOVERY CENTER | $5,000 |
| CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMercy Corps4× · 2018–2023 · $125k · revenue +22%
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL5× · 2018–2024 · $115k · revenue +49%
COLUMBIA LAND TRUST4× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- OIOUTSIDE INone grant, 2022 · $25k
- MAMAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -26%
OUTSIDE INone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Providing equitable access to nutritious food, with dignity, to those in the community facing food insecurity.
The mission of the Hollywood Farmers Market is to celebrate the bounty of Oregon and Washington agriculture through the operation of a community based farmers market and other ventures that support small farmers and healthy urban…
Neighborhood farmers market alliance's mission is to strengthen and support washington's small farms and farming families by providing effective direct sales sites and broadening access to seattle shoppers.
Pfm operates world-class farmers markets that contribute to the success of local food growers and producers and create vibrant community gatherings. as a trade association, success for our vendors is our primary objective. listening and…
Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.
Our village gardens brings a spirit of hope to the people by growing and sharing food, learning and teaching skills, and empowering community leadership.(continued on schedule o)our village gardens leverages community organizing, skill…
Helping under-served populations in oregon with greater access to healthy, locally grown food.
Our mission is to protect the rural nature of Wallowa County by working cooperatively with private landowners,indigenous people, local communities and governmental entities to conserve land.
The principal purpose of Grow Good Hawaii is to promote urban agro-ecology, specifically, the production of food (fruits, vegetables, etc.} locally, as well as the creation of urban biodiversity islands (gardens).
The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.
The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Artstra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds OUR CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds IMUA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Inter-Faith Treasure House ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds WEST COLUMBIA GORGE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds CAMAS-WASHOUGAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ALBINA VISION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA PLAY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ECOTRUST ↗
- Who funds MAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Growing Gardens ↗
- Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
- Who funds BLACK FARM BUREAU ↗
- Who funds ROCK N ROLL CAMP FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds OPEN HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GROW SOME GOOD ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ZENGER FARM ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds SARAH BELLUMS BAKERY & WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds KIHEI YOUTH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · Ninety-Nine Girlfriends · Sangham Foundation · The Swigert Foundation · The Healy Foundation · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Norman C Danielson Foundation Co Riverview
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kind Heart Free Spirit Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Friends of Zenger Farm — 28% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- High Desert Museum — 11% of income from government
- The Blueprint Foundation — 10% of income from government
- Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
- Sarah Bellums Bakery & Workshop — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kind Heart Free Spirit Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kind Heart Free Spirit Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.