Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$277kHuman Services$167kReligion$135kFood & Nutrition$93kHousing & Shelter$58kEducation$53kYouth Development$34kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PONY EXPRESS NATIONAL MUSEUM$65,000
HEARTLAND FOUNDATION$25,000
SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$15,000
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$10,000
ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH$9,500
EVOLUTION UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,500
CROSSING OUTREACH$6,000
MISSION HOUSE COVENANT COMMUNITY LIFE RE$5,000
SISTERS OF SOLACE$5,000
NOYES HOME FOR CHILDREN$5,000
PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING$5,000
ST JOSEPH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC$4,500
SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC$3,500
ST JOSEPH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KS & NW MO$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%SISTERS OF SOLACE: $5k → 18%SISTERS OF SOLACE: $5k → 18%SISTERS OF SOLACE: $9k → 18%SISTERS OF SOLACE: $5k → 18%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $4k → 18%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $4k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MO
VA
AZ
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$743k · 23 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
34

Total granted

$743k
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+7%

Still filing today

57%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PE
    PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +199%
  • PP
    PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $53k · revenue +89%
  • HF
    Heartland Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IC
    Interfaith Community Services
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -12%
  • FO
    Friends of the Park
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -49% · 96% of their budget
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR FOOD KITCHEN
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph Housing Initiative

As a faith-based organization, our mission is to create vibrant communities through affordable quality housing where low and moderate income families can thrive, prosper and build wealth.

Housing & Shelter
2
St Joseph Care Center

To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.

Health
3
St Joseph Community Co-op Inc

To provide quality, value added services to our clients, while expanding their opportunities for independence.

Employment
4
St Joseph Area Chamber of Commerce

To serve as a catalyst for economic grown and development in northwest missouri

—
5
St Joseph's Social Care and Thrift Store

Food cupboard and direct financial aid to individuals and families in need

Human Services
6
St Joseph's Conference of the Society of St Vincent De Paul Inc

A network of friends, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.

Human Services
7
Jefferson County Historical Society

To preserve, maintain and restore historical artifacts and information for future generations.

—
8
Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc

To support the benevolent, charitable, scientific, religious, and educational activities of public charitable corporations. to perform, foster and support acts of christian charity among the sick, ailing and needy, and to provide resources…

Philanthropy
9
Saint Joseph Home Health Care

Saint Joseph Home Health Care seeks to serve the poor, elderly, and disabled in a way that pleases God and honors the dignity of each person.

Health
10
Community Council of St Charles County

For over 70 years, the Community Council of St. Charles County has been dedicated to bringing people together to build stronger, more resilient communities. Our Mission is to connect nonprofits, service providers, government entities, and…

—
11
Sisters of St Joseph Neighborhood Network

The Network meets the needs of residents as they occur. This includes education programs for children and adults, community engagement activities, public installation of art and culture, neighborhood revitalization, emergency support with…

—
12
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Community Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PONY EXPRESS NATIONAL MUSEUM: $125,450 · OtherPONY EXPRESS NATIONAL MUSEUMSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $70,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANKEVOLUTION UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $62,500 · OtherEVOLUTION UNITED METHODIST CHURCHST JAMES CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherST JAMES CATHOLIC CHURCHInterfaith Community Services: $40,000 · OtherInterfaith Community ServicesKING HILL CEMETERY PRESERVATION CORP: $24,389 · OtherST JOSEPH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $21,532 · Other+41 more: $222,266 · Other+41 morePONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC: $63,618 · Arts & CulturePONY EXPRESS…ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART: $25,000 · Arts & CultureALBRECHT-KEM…ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI: $14,500 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS …+1 more: $3,350 · Arts & CultureSISTERS OF SOLACE: $44,225 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesHeartland Foundation: $50,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC: $8,535 · HealthPIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC: $53,400 · EducationFriends of the Park: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST JOSEPH: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $21,116 · Philanthropy
Other$616,137Arts & Culture$106,468Human Services$71,225Health$58,535Education$53,400Recreation & Sports$30,000Philanthropy$21,116

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC: $63,618 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetPIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC: $53,400 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetHeartland Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSISTERS OF SOLACE: $44,225 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetInterfaith Community Services: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART: $25,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetST JOSEPH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $21,532 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $21,116 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of the Park: $20,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI: $14,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CROSSING OUTREACH: $11,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetYOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST JOSEPH: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC: $8,535 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN: $5,350 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetST JOSEPH COMMUNITY CHORUS INC: $4,500 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetST JOSEPH MUSEUMS INC: $3,350 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SISTERS OF SOLACE ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services ↗
  • Who funds ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Park ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED ARTS COUNCIL OF ST JOSEPH MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSSING OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST JOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold P Dugdale Charitable TrustMN41.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Helen N Poston Charitable Trust · Spratt Leah Charitable Trust · The Moya Family Foundation · Gary G Taylor Charitable Tr · Gertrude & Doyle Norris Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norma J and William J Kenney’s filings →

    More from the funding graph