· Private foundation
Gary G Taylor Charitable Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC | $12,000 |
| ST JOSEPH SAFETY & HEALTH COUNCIL | $10,600 |
| PONY EXPRESS NATIONAL MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| MOUND CITY DOWNTOWN RESTORATION & REVITA | $10,000 |
| TARKIO COLLEGE | $9,900 |
| NW MISSOURI ENTERPRISE FACILITATION | $9,700 |
| NODAWAY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $9,700 |
| MU EXTENSION IN DEKALB COUNTY | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| ATCHISON COUNTY MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KS & NW MO INC | $5,000 |
| PONY EXPRESS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS | $5,000 |
| ANDREW COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC5× · 2021–2025 · $67k · revenue +28%
- SJST JOSEPH SAFETY AND HEALTH COUNCIL6× · 2018–2025 · $64k · revenue +2%
- GSGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- HCHOLT COUNTY MUSEUM & RESEARCH CENTERone grant, 2018 · $40k
- HCHOLT COUNTY CANCER FUND INCone grant, 2021 · $15k
- AFALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ENRICHMENTone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Collection and preservation of historical documents pertaining to saint charles county, missouri and making them available to the general public
To provide productive employment opportunities to educable and trainable handicapped individuals
Provide housing for elderly
Operation of a local history museum.
Provide meals,transportation and social interaction opportunities for senior citizens living in platte county missouri
To serve as a catalyst for economic grown and development in northwest missouri
Feed the needy, emergency funds for the needy and seniors, electric assisance for the needy and seniors.
Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri
Operate museum
Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.
To promote the North St Louis County economy and community
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lettuce Dream. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 35. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH SAFETY AND HEALTH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
- Who funds HOLT COUNTY MUSEUM & RESEARCH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Tarkio College ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds ELMO BETTERMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MISSOURI INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NODAWAY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ANDREW COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ATCHISON COUNTY MULTI PURPOSE CTR ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Gladys M Rickard Charitable Trust · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Young at Heart Resources · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · Mfa Oil Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gary G Taylor Charitable Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.