Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norma Green Family Fdn Irr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$150kAnimals$86kHousing & Shelter$68kEducation$68kArts & Culture$60kSocial Science$58kCrime & Legal$56kInternational$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
$14,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$792k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$19,000
NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER$15,000
THE FOOD DEPOT$15,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$15,000
FAMILYTOFAMILY INC$14,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$12,000
NORTHERN NEW MEXICO STREET$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$7,000
SKY VELVET VASSAR MUSIC$5,000
TOMORROWS WOMEN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SAFE HORIZONS INC: $5k → 17%SAFE HORIZONS INC: $5k → 17%SAFE HORIZONS INC: $5k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $2k → 14%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $7k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $7k → 17%THE FOOD DEPOT: $15k → 12%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $6k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $6k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $6k → 17%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
AZ
NM
DC
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$614k · 31 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
27

Total granted

$614k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+23%

Still filing today

55%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $80k · revenue +52%
  • UR
    URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +70%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +617%

Funded once

  • CF
    CREATIVITY FOR PEACE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TE
    TEXAS EQUAL ACCESS FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • NN
    NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
4
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

—
5
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
6
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
7
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
8
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
9
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
10
California Partnership to End Domestic Violence

The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…

Civil Rights
11
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
12
Sociedad Interamericana De Prensa Inc

Between 2024 and 2025, the committee on freedom of the press and information, together with its subcommittees on impunity and chapultepecsalta, participated in approximately nine activities. these included a panel discussion entitled…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Horizon Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Malala Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON INSTITUTE FOR CREATIVE RESEARCH: $58,000 · OtherOREGON INSTITUTE FOR CREATIVE RESEARCHOREGON INSTITUTE OFOR CREATIVE: $40,000 · OtherOREGON INSTITUTE OFOR CREATIVECOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $36,300 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $30,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INCNORTHERN NEW MEXICO STREET: $28,000 · OtherNORTHERN NEW MEXICO STREETESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $21,000 · OtherNEW DESTINY HOUSING: $18,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN EDUCATION: $18,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+32 more: $161,700 · Other+32 moreST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthST VINCENT HOSPITAL …NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $32,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEAL…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $23,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD F…URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $35,000 · Human ServicesURBAN RES…THE FOOD DEPOT: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD …SAFE HORIZON INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORI…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalECPAT-USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $7,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 · InternationalAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $18,250 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $12,000 · Civil RightsJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $8,000 · Civil RightsANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $10,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,500 · AnimalsESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 · AnimalsYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$441,000Health$135,500Human Services$67,000International$44,000Civil Rights$38,250Animals$19,500Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetOREGON INSTITUTE FOR CREATIVE RESEARCH: $58,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $32,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $23,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $18,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $10,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECPAT-USA INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON INSTITUTE FOR CREATIVE RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY TO FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROW'S WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND ↗
  • Who funds ECPAT-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Allene & Jerome Lapides Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Battelle Memorial Institute · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norma Green Family Fdn Irr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norma Green Family Fdn Irr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norma Green Family Fdn Irr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph