Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norbert and Paula Gits Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$257k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$254k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$254kReligion$15kArts & Culture$13kHealth$9kEducation$6kEnvironment$4kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $2k
  • $250k+1 grant · $254k
$750
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND CO BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY$254,375
ST MARY'S PARISH$860
ST MARY'S SCHOOL$750
LEELANAU HISTORICAL SOCIETY$550
LAKE LEELANAU LAKE ASSOCIATION$100
ALZHEIMER DISEASE FUND$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OR
OH
NJ
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 17 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +139% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2021, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$45k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%
+51%

Still filing today

53%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $254k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthEducationInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    Leelanau Historical Society
    5× · 2017–2021 · $9k · revenue +139%
  • FP
    FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +258%
  • MH
    MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC OF INDIAN RIVER
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • SS
    SANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum

Ann arbor hands-on museum creates moments of discovery that inspire curiosity, exploration and respect for stem and the natural world. together with the leslie science & nature center, we envision a world where curiosity today leads to…

Arts & Culture
3
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
6
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Heckscher Museum

Museum has a mission to create opportunties for everyone to experience art that broadens understanding of the past, fosters community connections to the present, and creates diverse possbilities for the future.

Arts & Culture
9
American Antiquarian Society

Supports and maintains a research library of american history and culture. the american antiquarian society cultivates a deeper understanding of the american past, grounded in its ever-growing collection of printed and manuscript sources.…

Education
10
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
11
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
12
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leelanau Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Sande School of Horsemanship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND CO BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY: $254,375 · OtherBESSEMER NATIONAL GIFT FUND CO BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY+27 more: $32,462 · Other+27 moreLeelanau Historical Society: $9,215 · Arts & CultureFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $3,200 · Arts & CultureOLD ART BUILDING: $542 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $60 · Arts & CultureLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $2,000 · EnvironmentLAKE LEELANAU LAKE ASSOCIATION: $1,300 · EnvironmentMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $200 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $50 · HealthSANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $885 · InternationalLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $605 · Religion
Other$286,837Arts & Culture$13,017Environment$3,600Health$1,250Human Services$1,000International$885Religion$605

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLeelanau Historical Society: $9,215 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $3,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE LEELANAU LAKE ASSOCIATION: $1,300 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $885 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC: $605 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOLD ART BUILDING: $542 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Leelanau Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE LEELANAU LAKE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD ART BUILDING ↗
  • Who funds LEELANAU CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Traverse Regional Community FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation · Edmund F and Virginia B Ball Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Alpaugh Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norbert and Paula Gits Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norbert and Paula Gits Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norbert and Paula Gits Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph