Skip to content
Nonprofit VOTE Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Nonprofit VOTE Inc

Nonprofit VOTE equips our nation's nonprofits with nonpartisan tools and resources to help the communities they serve to participate in voting and democracy.

$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Community Improvement$602kPublic Benefit$289kHousing & Shelter$239kPhilanthropy$52kCivil Rights$40kHuman Services$24kReligion$15kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $136,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $284,166 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $148,166 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $105k
$9,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Resource Center$40,000
Michigan Nonprofit Association$35,000
Democracy North Carolina$30,000
Human Service Chamber Foundation$9,000
Virginia Housing Alliance$8,000
AZ Impact for Good$7,000
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Asian Pacific Amer Leadership Inst: $12k → 14%Asian American Federation: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$994k · 8 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$994k
$303k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-28%
+31%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementCivil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $98k · revenue +11%
  • TN
    TIDES NETWORK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +103%
  • VH
    VIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $39k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • NP
    NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $83k · revenue +118%
  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • GA
    GEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
2
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
3
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
6
Center for Popular Democracy Inc

The center for popular democracy (cpd) and its affiliates know that everyday people have the power to change the world. we upend business and politics as usual to forge a representative, multiracial government and society where we all…

Public Benefit
7
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
8
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
11
National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development

National CAPACD advances equity and creates vibrant, healthy neighborhoods by mobilizing and strengthening a powerful coalition of community-based organizations working in low-income Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander…

Community Improvement
12
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Empowerment Programs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pafco Education Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $246,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INCNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC: $82,960 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INCTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementPOWER INTERFAITH INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementGreater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers: $14,500 · Community Improvement+3 more: $27,000 · Community Improvement+3 moreMICHIGAN NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION: $221,500 · OtherMICHIGAN NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $87,000 · OtherHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIAVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE: $39,000 · OtherVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCECIVICGEORGIA LLC: $24,670 · OtherCIVICGEORGIA LLCNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC: $15,000 · OtherGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $35,133 · Other+4 moreDemocracy North Carolina: $232,500 · Civil RightsDemocracy North CarolinaNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN VOTE - MICHIGAN: $13,000 · Civil RightsUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE OHIO UUJO: $12,000 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE: $12,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $98,000 · EmploymentTIDES NETWORK: $45,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyINSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCEMENT: $12,400 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesMinnesota State College Student Association Inc: $9,000 · EducationTHE HUMAN SERVICE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Education
Community Improvement$405,460Other$437,303Civil Rights$284,500Employment$98,000Philanthropy$52,000Human Services$24,400Education$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $246,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina: $232,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMICHIGAN NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION: $221,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO: $98,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $87,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC: $82,960 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTIDES NETWORK: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE: $39,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOWER INTERFAITH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers: $14,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN VOTE - MICHIGAN: $13,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCEMENT: $12,400 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE OHIO UUJO: $12,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON PROGRESS FORUM: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN INDIAN FAMILY COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPAFCO EDUCATION FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetMinnesota State College Student Association Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HUMAN SERVICE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe League of Women Voters of the Greater Dayton Area: $5,133 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundTides FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationWallace H Coulter Tru…Wallace H Coulter Fou…Movement Strategy Cen…The Kresge FoundationAARPWK Kellogg FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…
New Venture FundDC23× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Wallace H Coulter Trust · Wallace H Coulter Foundation · Movement Strategy Center · The Kresge Foundation · AARP · WK Kellogg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nonprofit VOTE Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nonprofit VOTE Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nonprofit VOTE Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nonprofit VOTE Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nonprofit VOTE’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home