Skip to content

· Private foundation

Noll Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$815k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$3.2MHealth$1.0MYouth Development$492kHuman Services$490kEducation$205kRecreation & Sports$169kReligion$162kPhilanthropy$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $400k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $410k
$35,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$150,000
AMIGOS MINISTRIES$80,000
PARTNERS RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT$70,000
JF KAPNEK TRUST$60,000
GRACE REFUGE OUTREACH WORLDWIDE$50,000
AGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY$45,000
CHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS$40,000
BEAUTIFUL RESPONSE$40,000
PALS PROGRAM$35,000
DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION$35,000
ARM OF CARE$30,000
YOUNG LIFE - SAN RAMON$30,000
YOUNG LIFE - MOUNTAIN WEST REGION$30,000
MISSIONARY ATHLETES INTERNATIONAL$25,000
BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK (BAUN PROJECT)$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $687k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EMBRACE WASHINGTON: $20k → 12%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $135k → 9%EMBRACE WASHINGTON: $15k → 12%EMBRACE WASHINGTON: $10k → 12%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 9%EMBRACE WASHINGTON: $10k → 12%BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK: $40k → 10%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 9%BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK: $30k → 10%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 9%BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK: $30k → 10%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK: $30k → 10%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK: $30k → 10%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK: $10k → 10%PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%CHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS: $65k → 9%CHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS: $45k → 9%CHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 32 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
8

Total granted

$5.6M
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

53%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $326k · revenue +56%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $312k · revenue +59%
  • PC
    PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $312k · revenue +963%

Funded once

  • GO
    GRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • ST
    SHOULDER TO SHOULDER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
2
Orphans Hope International
—
3
Be Hope International
Religion
4
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
5
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
6
Ray of Light

Fund raising for compassionate ministries and ministerial support.

Philanthropy
7
Project Renewed Hope Inc

Support of Orphaned, Displaced or Abandoned children.

Human Services
8
New Hope for Adopted International Kids

Help struggling families and children who have been adopted from international families in other countries work to adjust to their new life and bring some into other families

Human Services
9
Camp Grace

Create faith-filled environment for chil

Youth Development
10
GodsKidsorg
Human Services
11
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
12
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape Children's Ministry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grace Opens Doors Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $850,000 · OtherHOPE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIESHOPE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN: $559,544 · OtherHOPE INSTITUTE FOR CHILDRENCANYON HILLS CHURCH: $422,188 · OtherCANYON HILLS CHURCHJF KAPNEK TRUST: $383,000 · OtherJF KAPNEK TRUSTPALS PROGRAM: $181,000 · OtherPALS PROGRAMBEAUTIFUL RESPONSE: $179,500 · OtherMissionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc: $167,000 · Other+19 more: $644,144 · Other+19 morePADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $312,000 · Human ServicesPADRINO CHILDREN'S …AGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE CHILDREN'S MI…THE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesTHE BAY AREA URBAN …CHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS: $150,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF FAITH M…EMBRACE WASHINGTON: $55,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE WASHINGTONDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA: $325,812 · HealthDOWN SYNDR…ARM OF CARE INC: $201,000 · HealthARM OF CAR…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $312,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN OF STRENGTH: $113,000 · InternationalGrace Refuge Outreach Worldwide: $90,000 · InternationalKids Alive International Inc: $26,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · InternationalPARTNERS RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $140,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $65,000 · PhilanthropyKATIE NUES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $135,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,386,376Human Services$987,000Health$536,812Youth Development$312,000International$249,000Philanthropy$215,000Crime & Legal$135,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA: $325,812 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $312,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $312,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetAGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC: $300,000 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetARM OF CARE INC: $201,000 over 9y, 27% of budgetTHE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC: $170,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetMissionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc: $167,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS: $150,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetPARTNERS RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT: $140,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE FORGE FOR FAMILIES: $135,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCHILDREN OF STRENGTH: $113,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetGrace Refuge Outreach Worldwide: $90,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $65,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEMBRACE WASHINGTON: $55,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetNEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC: $43,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKids Alive International Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSHOULDER TO SHOULDER: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetKATIE NUES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PADRINO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARM OF CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAY AREA URBAN NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Missionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF FAITH MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS RELIEF & DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE FORGE FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds Grace Refuge Outreach Worldwide ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACE WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds NEW MISSION SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kids Alive International Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SONRISE EQUESTRIAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHOULDER TO SHOULDER ↗
  • Who funds KATIE NUES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noll Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noll Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Noll Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Noll Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Noll’s filings →

    More from the funding graph