Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Greg and Alissa Blankenship Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$78kArts & Culture$52kHealth$17kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$4kCommunity Improvement$750Animals$500
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$274k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UVMC FOUNDATION$10,000
MC PAW$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $25k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $20k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $5k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 4 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$141k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
-3%

Still filing today

75%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Miami County YMCA
    6× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +68%
  • PA
    PIQUA ARTS COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +574%
  • UF
    UVMC FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK SOUP KITCHEN
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • TD
    THE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.

2
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Hospice of Dayton Inc

The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…

Human Services
5
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
6
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
7
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

8
Toledo Regional Chamber of Commerce

To solve critical business challenges in order to create vibrant economic opportunities for all in our region.

9
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

10
Atrium Medical Center

We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.

Health
11
Pikeville Medical Center Inc

The center's mission is to advance the health and well-being of our region through comprehensive care in a christian environment.

Health
12
Ohio Chamber of Commerce

As the state's leading business advocate and resource, the ohio chamber of commerce aggressively champions free enterprise, economic competitiveness and growth for the benefit of all ohioans.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Miami County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Piqua Arts Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Miami County YMCA — $76,250 · Human ServicesMiami County YMCAPIQUA ARTS COUNCIL INC — $50,000 · Arts & CulturePIQUA ARTS COUNCIL INC+1 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureUVMC FOUNDATION — $11,000 · PhilanthropyUVMC FOUND…THE TROY FOUNDATION — $3,750 · PhilanthropyTHE TROY F…JOHNSTON FARM & INDIAN AGENCY — $4,000 · OtherST PATRICK SOUP KITCHEN — $2,500 · OtherFAMILY ABUSE SHELTER OF MIAMI COUNTY INC — $1,000 · OtherPIQUA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $750 · OtherHOSPICE OF MIAMI COUNTY INC — $500 · OtherMC PAW — $500 · OtherCASAS GAL OF MIAMI COUNTY — $500 · OtherPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $5,100 · Health
Human Services$76,250Arts & Culture$51,500Philanthropy$14,750Other$9,750Health$5,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMiami County YMCA — $76,250 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPIQUA ARTS COUNCIL INC — $50,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetUVMC FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC — $5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TROY FOUNDATION — $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE SHELTER OF MIAMI COUNTY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIQUA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIAMI COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Upper Valley Medical CenterOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Upper Valley Medical Center · The Paul G Duke Foundation · The Troy Foundation · Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn · Miami Valley Hospital · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Greg and Alissa Blankenship Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Greg and Alissa Blankenship Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Greg and Alissa Blankenship Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph