· Private foundation
Newton Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A LIGHT TO THE NATIONS | $67,000 |
| HATIKVA PROJECT | $42,500 |
| LAMPLIGHTER MINISTRIES | $8,000 |
| MULTIPLY EQUIP IMPACT INC | $7,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF ISRAEL RELATED MINIST | $6,000 |
| GIVE HOPE MINISTRIES | $5,500 |
| JESSICA FRIENDS COMMUNITY | $5,000 |
| HOUSE OF STEPHANAS | $4,900 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $4,462 |
| SPRINGS OF HOPE FOUNDATION | $3,250 |
| MIFIK GLOBAL MISSIONS | $3,000 |
| FRIENDS OF MAKOR HATIKVAH INC | $2,500 |
| MODERN DAY MISSIONS | $1,000 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALA LIGHT TO THE NATIONS2× · 2023–2024 · $97k · revenue +7%
Compassion International Incorporated7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +7%- PIPRISON IN THE WILD INC5× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- GCGATEWAY CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $10k
- HMHOPE MINISTRYone grant, 2018 · $10k
- TMTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES CENTERone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
The mission of CMI is to give the message of hope to Israel and a message of enlightenment to Gentile Christians. The purpose is to proclaim the Gospel to the Jewish people worldwide as well as educate the Christian community about its…
Supporing missionaries worldwide
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
The mjbi educates and empowers messianic jewish believers in yeshua jesus for the prophetic restoration of israel in 7 countries and 21 schools globally. additionally, mjbi educates the church on the jewish roots of christianity through…
Provide oversight spititual support, evangelize the word help the poor and needy including aid in the translation of the nible
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pastors Discipleship Network and the most unlike its peers is Prison in the Wild Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A LIGHT TO THE NATIONS ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds PRISON IN THE WILD INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS ↗
- Who funds HATIKVA PROJECT US INC ↗
- Who funds PASTORS DISCIPLESHIP NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MIFIK GLOBAL MISSION ↗
- Who funds Highway 19 Ministries ↗
- Who funds The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLY EQUIP IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds ONE KING INC ↗
- Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MAKOR HATIKVAH INC ↗
- Who funds CHURCH'S MINISTRY AMONG JEWISH PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY MISSIONS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Jewish Voice Ministries Intl · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Newton Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oral Roberts University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.