· Public charity
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 72 grants below total $1,108,626 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,072,723 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,964,097 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k28 grants · $184k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $781k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $144k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RUACH ISRAEL CONGREGATION | $90,000 |
| REACH INITIATIVE | $54,000 |
| VISION FOR ISRAEL | $47,500 |
| MJTI | $40,511 |
| HATIKVA PROJECT US | $36,000 |
| MAOZ ISRAEL MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| UNION OF MESSIANIC JEWISH | $30,000 |
| ICN MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| TOWARDS JERUSALEM COUNCIL | $24,500 |
| REVIVE ISRAEL | $24,000 |
| JEZREEL INTERNATIONAL | $24,000 |
| FUSION GLOBAL | $24,000 |
| HOPE FOR ISRAEL | $24,000 |
| LECH L'CHA | $22,505 |
| AHAVAT YESHUA | $21,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.7M on the FY2020 return
Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · SCHOLARSHIP · DENTAL TREATMENT- HOLOCAUST SURVIVORS & GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
71 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2020, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ROREMNANT OF ISRAEL4× · 2017–2020 · $145k · revenue +103%
- THTHE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS4× · 2017–2020 · $141k · revenue +86%
- AMAskDrBrown Ministries Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $132k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- HPHATIKVA PROJECTone grant, 2017 · $50k
- HOHOUSE OF ISRAEL INTL MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +57%
- BMBETH MESSIAH CONGREGATION - TXone grant, 2017 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Education
To teach about prayer and Israel.
The mission of CMI is to give the message of hope to Israel and a message of enlightenment to Gentile Christians. The purpose is to proclaim the Gospel to the Jewish people worldwide as well as educate the Christian community about its…
The evangelism of the Jewish people in the name of Jesus the Messiah.
publish religious books
Ministry to Christians and Jewish People
Motivated by the knowledge that the Word of the Lord will go forth from Jerusalem to the Nations, and guided by a commitment to read the New Testament in its first century context, Jerusalem Seminary provides cutting-edge ministry training…
The ministry is organized for the following purposes: (1)to minister to the Jewish people and educate them as to the Christian faith and their place in it according to the Bible; (2) to minister to other non-Christians and educate them as…
We are a gospel mission seeking to reach out to jewish and gentile people with the good news that jesus christ is the messiah of israel and the savior of the world, while edifying people about the jewish roots of christianity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light of Zion and the most unlike its peers is Duke University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MESSIANIC JEWISH BIBLE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds REMNANT OF ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF STEPHANAS ↗
- Who funds MAOZ INC ↗
- Who funds AskDrBrown Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds Seed of Abraham Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM'S BLESSING ↗
- Who funds HATIKVA PROJECT US INC ↗
- Who funds FUSION GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MINISTRY AKA MAKOR CHAIM ↗
- Who funds DEVAR EMET MESSIANIC JEWISH OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds Ministry of Heritage House Inc ↗
- Who funds GATEWAYS BEYOND INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds CHEVRA USA ↗
- Who funds BOB & ROSE WEINER MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE IN ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds Together for Israel Inc ↗
- Who funds Interfaithfulness ↗
- Who funds WORLD DENTAL RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST FRUITS OF ZION INC ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INTL ↗
- Who funds KOOME MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds LIGHT OF ZION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS FOR WORLD PEACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fellowship of Israel Related Ministries Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · In His Steps Foundation · Israel Benevolence Fund Inc · Maoz Inc · Newton Family Foundation Inc · The Wagler Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Tyndale House Ministries · GiveClear Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jewish Voice Ministries Intl funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.