Skip to content
New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$148k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$593kEnvironment$136kEducation$73kInternational$63kCivil Rights$63kArts & Culture$48kPublic Benefit$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $130k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Village and Wilderness Project Inc$20,000
Encampment For Citizenship$20,000
Green Across the World Inc$20,000
University of Washington Foundation$15,000
Tides Foundation$15,000
Latin American Youth Center Inc$10,000
State Voices$10,000
New Venture Fund$10,000
Project Eats Inc$10,000
SW Voter Registration Education Pro$5,000
Zenith Accelerated Learning Academy$2,500
Urban Farming Institute of Boston I$2,500
Freedom United$2,500
Solidarity Inc$2,500
Ray of Hope Institute Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Freedom United: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 12 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$307k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+16%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +2%
  • GA
    GREEN ACROSS THE WORLD INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue +155% · 42% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $43k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +95%
  • NI
    NICAPHOTO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue +13%
  • HC
    HAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +211%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Ties Us

Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Center for the study of the Americas

Within the Americas promoting dialogue and research, producing studies and reports, conducting courses and conferences particularly in the areas of agroecology and food security

—
4
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
5
Natural Resource Governance Institute

Nrgi envisions a world where natural resources enable fair, prosperous and sustainable societies, instead of undermining them. nrgi exists because decisions about how natural resources are governed determine the well-being of people in…

International
6
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Solidaridad North America

We work throughout the whole supply chain to make sustainability the norm and enable farmers and workers to earn a decent income, produce in balance with nature, and shape their own future.

Environment
9
Multinational Exchange for Sustainable a Mesa andor Mesa Inc

MESA connects and cultivates sustainable farmers and food systems leaders around the world.

Education
10
World Future Society

The world future society works to improve decision-making about the future by empowering futurists, fostering networks and advancing knowledge and action on future critical issues.

—
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund; the most unlike its peers is Green Across the World Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
25/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $563,243 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+2 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN ACROSS THE WORLD INC: $46,000 · InternationalGREEN ACROS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…CROSSCURRENTS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE: $10,000 · InternationalCROSSCURREN…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICARES …+2 more: $5,000 · InternationalENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $22,500 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $42,500 · EducationNICAPHOTO INC: $20,600 · EducationPARENTS NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $5,500 · EducationSOLIDARITY: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationVillage and Wilderness Project Inc: $40,185 · OtherVillage and Wi…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF …A DROP IN THE OCEAN INC: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE PARENST CIRCLE: $5,000 · OtherPROJECT EATS INC: $30,000 · OtherPROJECT EATS I…STATE VOICES: $10,000 · OtherSTATE VOICESSouthwest Voter Registration Education Project Inc: $5,000 · OtherTHE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC: $5,000 · OtherFeeding America: $5,000 · Other+8 more: $19,500 · Other+8 moreWINDWARD FUND: $30,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,000 · EnvironmentUNITED PLANT SAVERS: $10,000 · EnvironmentBIODIVERSITY WORKS: $2,500 · EnvironmentCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$583,243International$111,000Youth Development$85,000Education$76,100Other$139,685Environment$52,500Arts & Culture$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $563,243 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENCAMPMENT FOR CITIZENSHIP: $60,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetGREEN ACROSS THE WORLD INC: $46,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVillage and Wilderness Project Inc: $40,185 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetWINDWARD FUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT EATS INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNICAPHOTO INC: $20,600 over 1y, 11% of budgetHAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSCURRENTS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSTATE VOICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PLANT SAVERS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPARENTS NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $5,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSouthwest Voter Registration Education Project Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOLIDARITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFeeding America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIODIVERSITY WORKS: $2,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEGROWN NATIONAL PARK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEMMAUS HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom United: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodFidelity Investments …Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH10.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • The Urban Farming Institute of Bostoninc: 4% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP?

Find your warmest path to New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Tudor Foundation CO Hemenway & Barnes LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home