· Public charity
New Hampshire Women's Foundation Inc
New hampshire women's foundation invests in opportunity and equality for women and girls in new hampshire through research, advocacy, education and grant making.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $131,918 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $176,167 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,249 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAVEN | $17,500 |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM OF NH | $13,000 |
| LOVERING HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTH NE | $10,000 |
| OVERCOMERS REFUGEE SERVICES | $9,500 |
| MANCHESTER COMMUNITY ACTION COAL | $7,500 |
| TURNING POINTS NETWORK | $7,500 |
| FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER | $7,500 |
| CORNUCOPIA PROJECT | $7,500 |
| HOPE ON HAVEN HILL | $7,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL INST OF NE | $7,500 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PTNRSHP | $7,500 |
| KIMBALL JENKINS INC | $7,418 |
| BREAKTHROUGH MANCHESTER | $6,000 |
| CIRCLE PROGRAM | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER OF PORTSMOUTH INC5× · 2018–2024 · $45k · revenue +142%
- HVHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES4× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +163%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES5× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- GOGIRLS ON THE RUN NEW HAMPSHIREone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +21%
- NHNEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +592%
- MFMANCHESTER FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower and support positive choices for all and to educate and take action in the community for the prevention of oppression and violence.
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…
The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…
New hampshire women's foundation invests in opportunity and equality for women and girls in new hampshire through research, advocacy, education and grant making.
To provide community based services, advocacy and education to end domestic violence in lgbtq, polyamourous and sm communities.
To empower individuals to make positive change in their lives. We provide advocacy, resource services, education and shelter to victims/survivors of domestic and sexual violence, stalking, child and elder abuse, regardless of age, gender,…
The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS
Project SAGE creates social change to end interpersonal, relationship violence by challenging attitudes and beliefs about power, control, and gender norms and by advocating for victims and survivors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overcomers Refugee Services and the most unlike its peers is Shelter From the Storm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER OF PORTSMOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds OVERCOMERS REFUGEE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
- Who funds RESIST INC ↗
- Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds CLAREMONT LEARNING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Belknap House ↗
- Who funds HOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORNUCOPIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE HELP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIMBALL JENKINS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds LACONIA AREA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE DERRYFIELD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds New American Africans ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER FROM THE STORM ↗
- Who funds GIRLS AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORD FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds Seacoast Community School ↗
- Who funds PATRIOT RESILIENT LEADER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds COVER HOME REPAIR INC ↗
- Who funds VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds STARTING POINT SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds THE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FRONT DOOR AGENCY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Eastern Bank Foundation · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Hampshire Women's Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Women & Enterprise Inc — 27% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.