Skip to content

· Public charity

New Hampshire Health Information Organization

To establish an electronic network to transmit patient health information between health care providers in a timely, secure and confidential manner.

$377k
Granted FY2017
18
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $268,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $377,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $109,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k11 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $99k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$100k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENESIS HEALTHCARE$99,250
GRANITE STATE IND LIVING$29,250
RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$15,250
MHC OF GREATER MANCHESTER$15,000
GREATER NASHUA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$13,000
CROTCHED MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CARE$13,000
NORTHERN HUMAN SVCS$11,250
GENESIS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$9,750
SERVICE LINK MONADNOCKSULLIVAN$8,000
MID-STATE HEALTH CENTER$7,250
SEACOAST MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC$6,500
FRISBIE MEMMORIAL HOSPITAL$6,250
HUGGINS HOSPITAL$6,250
COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK$6,000
WEEKS MEDICAL CENTER$5,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GRANITE STATE IND LIVING: $29k → 7%NORTHERN HUMAN SVCS: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Seacoast Community Health

To deliver innovative, compassionate, integrated health services and support that are accessible to all in our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
2
Northern Counties Health Care Inc

Mission: To provide high-quality, accessible, patient-centered health care. Vision: NCHC is a key partner in building healthy families and thriving communities. Values: We pursue quality in all that we do and are committed to: Mutual…

Health
3
Amoskeag Health

The mission of Amoskeag Health is to improve the health and well-being of our patients and the communities we serve by providing exceptional care and services that are accessible to all.

Health
4
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

—
5
Houlton Regional Hospital

Houlton Regional Hospital's purpose is to provide safe, compassionate, quality, cost effective care to communities we serve. We are dedicated to improving the health status of those we support through education, treatment and…

Health
6
Regional Medical Center at Lubec Me Inc

To promote, provide and coordinate quality healthcare for the Downeast Region.

Health
7
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
8
Sacopee Valley Health Center

To provide accessible, comprehensive healthcare tailored to meet the needs of each individual and the community we serve.

Health
9
Penobscot Valley Hospital

To be our community's trusted healthcare partner, committed to the health and well-being of those we serve with compassion, quality, and excellence.

Health
10
Cottage Hospital

To strengthen the health of our community by providing accessible, quality care.

Health
11
White Mountain Community Health Center

White Mountain Community Health Center provides the community with affordable access to high-quality, compassionate, individualized healthcare and support services needed to achieve wellness.

Health
12
Gifford Health Care Inc

The mission of Gifford Health Care, Inc. and its subsidiaries is to enhance the health and well-being of our communities by providing excellent patient-centered care including senior living services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern New Hampshire Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Granite State Independent Living. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENESIS HEALTHCARE: $99,250 · OtherGENESIS HEALTHCARERIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $15,250 · OtherRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTHThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc: $15,000 · OtherThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester IncCrotched Mountain Community Care Inc: $13,000 · OtherCrotched Mountain Community Care IncFMH Wind-Down Company: $6,250 · OtherCommunity Council of Nashua NH Inc: $13,000 · HealthCommunity Council of Nashua…THE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $9,750 · HealthTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEA…MID-STATE HEALTH CENTER: $7,250 · HealthMID-STATE HEALTH CENTERSEACOAST MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,500 · HealthSEACOAST MENTAL HEALTH CENT…Huggins Hospital: $6,250 · HealthHuggins HospitalWEEKS MEDICAL CENTER: $5,500 · HealthWEEKS MEDICAL CENTERAmmonoosuc Community Health Services Inc: $5,500 · HealthAmmonoosuc Community Health…Coos County Family Health Services Inc: $5,500 · HealthCoos County Family Health S…Southern New Hampshire Medical Center: $5,500 · HealthSouthern New Hampshire Medi…GRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $29,250 · Human ServicesGRANITE STATE IND…Northern Human Services Inc: $11,250 · Human ServicesNorthern Human Se…MONADNOCK COLLABORATIVE: $8,000 · EducationCommunity Health Access Network: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$148,750Health$64,750Human Services$40,500Education$8,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRANITE STATE INDEPENDENT LIVING: $29,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $15,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Council of Nashua NH Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCrotched Mountain Community Care Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNorthern Human Services Inc: $11,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAKES REGION MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $9,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONADNOCK COLLABORATIVE: $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMID-STATE HEALTH CENTER: $7,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEACOAST MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFMH Wind-Down Company: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuggins Hospital: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health Access Network: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEEKS MEDICAL CENTER: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmmonoosuc Community Health Services Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCoos County Family Health Services Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire Medical Center: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH28.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Endowment For Health Inc · Granite United Way · Foundation for Healthy Communities · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · New England Telehealth Consortium · Northeast Delta Dental Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Hampshire Health Information Organization funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Hampshire Health Information Organization. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Hampshire Health Information Organization?

    Find your warmest path to New Hampshire Health Information Organization through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Hampshire Health Information Organization’s filings →

    More from the funding graph