Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

New Economy Coalition Inc

New economy coalition exists to support a just transition from an extractive to a regenerative economy by building the scale and power of the solidarity economy movement in black, indigenous, and working class communities in every region of the united states.

$408k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$238kArts & Culture$196kEnvironment$177kCivil Rights$138kPublic Benefit$82kYouth Development$48kReligion$48kFood & Nutrition$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 41 grants below total $357,138 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $407,682 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,544 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $221k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $136k
$7,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT SOUTH$25,750
NEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC$25,000
FELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY INC$16,500
US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC$14,000
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE INC$13,250
SYMBODIED LLC$11,250
CLEVELAND OWNS INC$10,000
POST GROWTH INSTITUTE INC$10,000
BELOVED COMMUNITY INCUBATOR INC$10,000
CROATAN INSTITUTE INC$9,932
PETTY PROPOLIS INC$8,250
WILDSEED SOCIETY INC$8,250
CO-OPERATE WNC INC$8,000
HANA CENTER INC$7,750
OGUN TACTICAL DEFENSE LLC$7,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BERKSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS THROUGH EDUCATION: $6k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $8k → 10%OPEN BUFFALO INC: $8k → 13%BLACK MAMAS VILLAGE INC: $8k → 10%CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE INC: $10k → 12%SOLIDARITY STL INC: $8k → 21%HANA CENTER INC: $8k → 14%DEEP ROOTS: $8k → 10%SOLIDARITY STL INC: $7k → 21%COLABORATIVA LA MILPA INC: $15k → 12%CHIFRESH KITCHEN: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$480k · 23 repeat orgs$716k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
49

Total granted

$480k
$491k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+33%

Still filing today

83%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CulturePublic BenefitEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    ORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $39k · revenue +77%
  • BO
    Builders of The Highway Foundation Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $33k · revenue +0%
  • KC
    KENTUCKY COALITION INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $22k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • BT
    BEAUTIFUL TROUBLE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +346%
  • RM
    Renew Missouri Advocatesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $26k · revenue +125%
  • CU
    CLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $24k · revenue +126%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Network for Developing Conscious Communities Inc

NDCC works collaboratively with partners to conduct and contract with others to conduct general organizational training activities including engaging in conferences and membership solicitation to educate, organize and distribute leadership…

Housing & Shelter
2
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
3
Its Time Network

It's Time Network is building a framework to support an inclusive and creative community of visionary leaders and change agents who are coalescing a long-term, broad-based civic engagement movement to evolve democracy, to heal and…

Civil Rights
4
Collaborative Earth Institute

We are scientists and engineers, humanists and designers. Coming together across disciplinary and cultural boundaries, we form focused teams to discover and co-create pathways to social and ecological regeneration.

Science & Tech
5
Revolution Institute

Revolution Institute's purpose is to liberate the expansive potential of African-American and Latinx communities through sustainable, future-oriented work, entrepreneurship, and value-aligned collaborations.

Employment
6
The Black Collaborative Inc
Community Improvement
7
Democracy Unlimited

Democracy Unlimited uplifts people to build a world where our systems of power prioritize the well-being of humans and the living world. We reclaim authority that has been unjustly seized by governments and corporations - all with the aim…

Education
8
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
9
Black Appalachian Coalition

Black Appalachian Coalition (BLAC), a multi-state organization working across Appalachia and the Ohio River Valley and Basin, is centered on story-based approaches that amplify Black voices, fights for environmental justice and strengthens…

Civil Rights
10
Blackspace Urbanist Collective Inc

BlackSpace's mission is to bridge gaps between people, place, and power to realize racial justice with Black communities.

Arts & Culture
11
New Brookwood Labor College

New Brookwood Labor College strives to address racial economic and social imbalances of power by educating workers into their class. We are creating an inclusive labor movement that uses the power of organization not merely to lift…

Education
12
Collective Remake Art Business Education Jobs News People and Rec

COLLECTIVE REMAKE: Art, Business, Education, Jobs, News, People, and Recycling for Sustainability is a unique social co-operative-in Los Angeles County-designed to support the creation of worker-owned businesses and other kinds of…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alena Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsDance Arts OrganizationsSchool Parent OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Faith-Based Social ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%13%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
4/100
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/87
Grantees still filing
47/87
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEAUTIFUL TROUBLE INC — $50,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL TROUBLE INCPROJECT SOUTH INC — $32,550 · OtherPROJECT SOUTH INCCARDS BY DE LLC — $20,285 · OtherCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $20,000 · OtherORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY — $38,600 · OtherORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACYBuilders of The Highway Foundation Inc — $32,535 · OtherBuilders of The Highway Foundation IncMadison Workers Cooperative — $22,247 · OtherOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $26,335 · Other+34 more — $280,841 · Other+34 moreWESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS EDUCATION PROJECT — $30,955 · Community ImprovementWESTERN ORGANIZATIO…NEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ECONOMY PROJECT…Worcester Youth Cooperatives Inc — $21,285 · Community ImprovementWorcester Youth Coo…Cleveland Owns — $20,000 · Community ImprovementCleveland OwnsNATIVE MOVEMENT — $17,150 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEMENTMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $17,000 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATIO…SOUTHERN SECTOR RISING — $12,800 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN SECTOR RIS…VILLAGE OF LOVE AND RESISTANCE — $12,050 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE OF LOVE AND…NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE WORKING WORLD INC — $8,235 · Community ImprovementCO-OPERATE WNC — $8,000 · Community Improvement+5 more — $30,300 · Community Improvement+5 moreRenew Missouri Advocates — $25,500 · EnvironmentRenew Misso…CLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT — $23,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN UP TH…APPALACHIAN VOICES — $15,000 · EnvironmentAPPALACHIAN…Urban Tilth — $14,535 · EnvironmentUrban TilthLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $13,800 · EnvironmentLOUISIANA B…CROATAN INSTITUTE — $9,932 · EnvironmentCROATAN INS…SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $8,235 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND …HEALTHY GULF — $6,800 · EnvironmentHEALTHY GUL…ENERGY JUSTICE LAW AND POLICY CENTER — $5,800 · EnvironmentSOLIDARITY STL INC — $15,535 · Human ServicesSOLIDARITY…Colaborativa La Milpa — $15,000 · Human ServicesColaborati…CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHAINBREAK…THE PEOPLE'S FUND — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE…DEEP ROOTS INC — $8,235 · Human ServicesDEEP ROOTS…Open Buffalo Inc — $8,235 · Human ServicesOpen Buffa…TIDES CENTER — $8,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENT…BLACK MAMAS VILLAGE — $7,750 · Human ServicesBLACK MAMA…THE HANA CENTER — $7,750 · Human ServicesTHE HANA C…THE COMMUNIVERSITY — $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUN…BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE — $5,800 · Human ServicesBERSHIRE R…CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS — $5,800 · Human ServicesCENTRO DE …FELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY INC — $31,535 · Arts & CultureFELLOWSHI…ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $18,735 · Arts & CultureALLIED ME…AGITARTE INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureAGITARTE …ACORN Center For Restoration & Freedom — $8,235 · Arts & CultureACORN Cen…NEXT LEVEL PUBLICATIONS GROUP INC — $7,750 · Arts & CultureNEXT LEVE…ROOT CAUSE RESEARCH CENTER INC — $6,800 · Arts & CultureROOT CAUS…MUSE 360 INCORPORATED — $6,800 · Arts & CultureMUSE 360 …ALENA MUSEUM INC — $6,250 · Arts & CultureALENA MUS…KENTUCKY COALITION INC — $22,000 · Public BenefitThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $21,000 · Public BenefitUS Solidarity Economy Network — $14,000 · Public BenefitPost Growth Institute — $10,000 · Public BenefitCommunity Movement Builders Inc — $9,800 · Public BenefitLETS GET FREE- THE WOMEN & TRANS — $5,800 · Public BenefitOne Voice — $5,000 · Public BenefitLibrary Of The Commons Co — $16,000 · EducationSustainable Economies Law Center — $13,535 · EducationMovement Generation — $10,000 · EducationMEADOWS-LIVINGSTONE SCHOOL — $6,500 · EducationBlack Sustainability Inc — $6,250 · EducationCOLLABORISING INC — $5,800 · Education
Other$523,393Community Improvement$212,775Environment$123,102Human Services$108,605Arts & Culture$96,105Public Benefit$87,600Education$58,085

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORGANIZATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY — $38,600 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC — $32,550 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBuilders of The Highway Foundation Inc — $32,535 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY INC — $31,535 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetWESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS EDUCATION PROJECT — $30,955 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION — $26,335 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRenew Missouri Advocates — $25,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetNEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCLEAN UP THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT — $23,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMadison Workers Cooperative — $22,247 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWorcester Youth Cooperatives Inc — $21,285 over 3y, 20% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCleveland Owns — $20,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $18,735 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $17,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $17,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOLIDARITY STL INC — $15,535 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetColaborativa La Milpa — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCINCINNATI UNION COOPERATIVE INITIATIVE — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUrban Tilth — $14,535 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUS Solidarity Economy Network — $14,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $13,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSustainable Economies Law Center — $13,535 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $13,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN SECTOR RISING — $12,800 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA AREA COOPERATIVE ALLIANCE — $12,300 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVILLAGE OF LOVE AND RESISTANCE — $12,050 over 2y, 11% of budgetAGITARTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMovement Generation — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPost Growth Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBELOVED COMMUNITY INCUBATOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLACK OREGON LAND TRUST — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE PEOPLE'S FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCROATAN INSTITUTE — $9,932 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Movement Builders Inc — $9,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WORKING WORLD INC — $8,235 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $8,235 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEEP ROOTS INC — $8,235 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetACORN Center For Restoration & Freedom — $8,235 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOpen Buffalo Inc — $8,235 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCO-OPERATE WNC — $8,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolidarity Research Center — $8,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Solutions Project IncWindward FundCommon Counsel Founda…New Venture FundThe Schmidt Family Fo…Rsf Social Finance IncTides FoundationThe Working World IncTides CenterProteus Fund IncSolidaire Network Inc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC49.2× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Solutions Project Inc · Windward Fund · Common Counsel Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Tides Foundation · The Working World Inc · Tides Center · Proteus Fund Inc · Solidaire Network Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Economy Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Ourspace World Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 100 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home