Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Solutions Project Inc

The Solutions Project funds and amplifies climate justice solutions created by frontline community organizations.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
146
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Environment$17MCommunity Improvement$7.2MCivil Rights$5.1MPublic Benefit$3.2MFood & Nutrition$1.7MHousing & Shelter$1.6MHuman Services$1.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 146 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k121 grants · $3.5M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.4M
$30,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kentucky Coalition$100,000
People United for Sustainable Housing$100,000
UPROSE$100,000
Asian Pacific Environmental Network (APEN$100,000
Catalyst Miami$100,000
4DaSoil$100,000
New Alpha Community Development Corp$100,000
Thunder Valley Community Development Corp$100,000
Strategic Concepts in Organizing (SCOPE)$50,000
Tides Foundation$50,000
The Smile Trust Inc$50,000
Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs$50,000
Communities For A Better Environment$50,000
ALIGN THE ALLIANCE FOR A GREATER NEW YORK$50,000
Alliance for a Just Society$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Center Pole: $125k → 23%Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Pe: $100k → 18%The SLAP Collective: $50k → 6%Good Work Institute: $125k → 16%Chainbreaker Collective: $120k → 12%Lowcountry Alliance For Model Communities: $30k → 11%Lowcountry Alliance For Model Communities: $40k → 12%Solidarity STL Inc: $50k → 21%Harambee House Inc: $30k → 8%Harambee House Inc: $30k → 16%Bridging The Gap In Virginia: $28k → 9%Casa Familiar Inc: $40k → 11%Shelterwood Collective: $40k → 18%The SLAP Collective: $50k → 6%La Cosecha CSA: $40k → 14%Lowcountry Alliance For Model Communities: $30k → 12%Harambee House Inc: $30k → 16%Casa Familiar Inc: $30k → 11%Lowcountry Alliance For Model Communities: $30k → 12%St Suzanne Cody Rouge Community Resource: $28k → 21%Harambee House Inc: $30k → 16%Casa Familiar Inc: $30k → 11%La Cosecha CSA: $28k → 14%Harambee House Inc: $28k → 16%Casa Familiar Inc: $30k → 11%Casa Familiar Inc: $28k → 11%Asian Pacific Environmental Netw Action: $50k → 10%Tides Center: $30k → 10%Open Buffalo: $28k → 13%Amistades Inc: $40k → 15%Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council: $30k → 16%Amistades Inc: $28k → 15%Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council: $30k → 16%Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council: $30k → 16%Northeast Houston Redevelopment Council: $30k → 16%The Smile Trust Inc: $100k → 15%The Smile Trust Inc: $50k → 15%Housing NOLA: $25k → 23%The Smile Trust Inc: $50k → 15%Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education: $200k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing (SCOPE): $200k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing: $50k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing (SCOPE): $50k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing (SCOPE): $33k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education: $33k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing (SCOPE): $30k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing (SCOPE): $30k → 14%Strategic Concepts in Organizing and Policy Education: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36M · 152 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

152 repeat relationships — 100 still active in FY2024, 52 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

152
186

Total granted

$36M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+12%

Still filing today

93%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $982k · revenue +312%
  • UI
    UPROSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $961k · revenue +200%
  • NA
    NEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $940k · revenue +54% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • FF
    Fund for Frontline Power
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • SC
    Southeast Climate & Energy Network -SCEN
    one grant, 2022 · $320k
  • J
    Justice40
    one grant, 2021 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
2
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
3
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
4
Earthworks

The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Earthworks is dedicated to protecting communities and the environment from the impacts of irresponsible mineral and energy development while seeking…

Public Benefit
5
Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice

Greenaction mobilizes community power to win victories that change govenment and corporate policies and practices to protect health and promote environmental, economic and social justice.

Environment
6
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
7
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
8
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc

Environmental Justice & Equality

Education
9
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
10
Climate Justice Hive

To connect, support, and uplift the various climate justice efforts, inspiring systems change in a metropolitan area.

Environment
11
Climate Resilient Communities

Climate Resilient Communities is empowering community voices to implement equitable climate solutions for unity, resilience, and justice.

Human Services
12
Climate Equity Action Fund

The climate equity action fund (ceaf) works hand-in-hand with community-based partners in critical states across the country to secure and sustain policy wins for climate and clean energy. building on over a decade of trust with leading…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lucky Shoals Community Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Social ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Mentoring ProgramsYouth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity Arts CentersYouth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%10/337
the rest of the field
13%
240,387/1,819,228

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

312 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 312 of the 345 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

25
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
105
Early backer (in before they grew)
301/312
Grantees still filing
198/312
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $827,500 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTRE…Asian Pacific Environmental Network — $762,000 · EnvironmentAsian Pacific Environmental Ne…LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $607,500 · EnvironmentTaproot Earth — $420,000 · Environment+50 more — $9,114,000 · Environment+50 moreFund for Frontline Power — $1,000,000 · OtherFund for Frontline PowerPROJECT SOUTH INC — $658,500 · OtherKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $780,000 · OtherUPROSE INC — $961,000 · OtherUPROSE INCPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $867,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY — $982,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY+68 more — $11,080,167 · Other+68 moreNEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $939,500 · Community ImprovementNEW ALPHA COMMU…THUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR — $884,500 · Community ImprovementTHUNDER VALLEY …CATALYST MIAMI INC — $839,500 · Community ImprovementCATALYST MIAMI …ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $350,000 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A …COALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS — $268,000 · Community ImprovementOPAL — $250,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE — $240,000 · Community ImprovementHASER Inc — $235,000 · Community ImprovementTHE DESCENDANTS PROJECT — $226,500 · Community ImprovementWest End Revitalization Association — $205,000 · Community Improvement+12 more — $1,397,000 · Community Improvement+12 moreStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $666,667 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $475,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $265,000 · Human ServicesTHE SMILE TRUST — $210,000 · Human ServicesCASA FAMILIAR INC — $157,500 · Human ServicesHarambee House Inc — $147,500 · Human ServicesNortheast Houston Redevelopment Council — $140,000 · Human ServicesTHE SLAP COLLECTIVE INC — $132,000 · Human ServicesLOWCOUNTRY ALLIANCE FOR MODEL COMMUNITIE — $130,000 · Human ServicesGood Work Institute Inc — $125,000 · Human ServicesCenter Pole — $125,000 · Human ServicesCHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE — $120,000 · Human Services+4 more — $272,500 · Human ServicesFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $820,000 · Civil RightsWECOUNT — $360,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY — $159,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $150,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $150,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $135,000 · Civil RightsAction Center on Race & the Economy Institute — $126,000 · Civil RightsGREAT PLAINS ACTION SOCIETY — $125,000 · Civil RightsMOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE IN EL BARRIO INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $100,000 · Civil RightsGirl Plus Environment Corporation — $97,500 · Civil RightsINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $240,000 · EducationKheprw Institute dba KI NuMedia CCFI — $220,000 · EducationSAFE 4 COMMUNITIES — $200,000 · EducationGreen Technical Education and Employment — $170,000 · EducationSouthern Echo Inc — $160,000 · Education4DASOIL — $155,000 · EducationBlack Sustainability Inc — $155,000 · EducationHBCU GREEN FUND INC — $150,000 · EducationSTEPS COALITION — $147,500 · EducationTO NIZHONI ANI — $140,000 · EducationPurposed Focused Alternative Learning Corporation — $125,000 · EducationCULTIVATE COLLECTIVE INC — $125,000 · EducationIndigenous Peoples Power Project Inc — $100,000 · Education+2 more — $137,500 · EducationNATIVE RENEWABLES INC — $795,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLE MANILA RISING — $270,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY ACTION NETWORK MOVEMENT INC — $170,000 · Arts & CultureEASTERN WOODLAND LACROSS — $165,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureWUKCHUMNI TRIBE — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMondo Bizarro Productions — $90,000 · Arts & CultureMOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT — $75,000 · Arts & Culture
Environment$11,731,000Other$16,328,667Community Improvement$5,835,000Human Services$2,966,167Civil Rights$2,322,500Education$2,225,000Arts & Culture$1,765,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY — $982,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetUPROSE INC — $961,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetNEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $939,500 over 8y, 41% of budgetTHUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR — $884,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $867,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetCATALYST MIAMI INC — $839,500 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $827,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $820,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetNATIVE RENEWABLES INC — $795,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $780,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetAsian Pacific Environmental Network — $762,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $666,667 over 5y, 14% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC — $658,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $607,500 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $475,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $447,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetUFW FOUNDATION — $447,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetLA MARANA CORP — $440,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetTaproot Earth — $420,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetSoutheast Climate & Energy Network — $385,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetUrban Tilth — $375,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetWest Street Recovery — $370,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetMULTIPLIER — $365,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWECOUNT — $360,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetTHE CLEO INSTITUTE INC — $354,000 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY — $350,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT — $342,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetUtah Dine Bikeyah — $330,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR WASHINGTONS FUTURE — $320,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetGasp — $307,500 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetWINNESHIEK ENERGY DISTRICT — $302,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetOne Voice — $300,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC — $290,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetGROUNDSWELL INC — $285,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetGEORGIA WAND EDUCATION FUND — $280,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetCOMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC — $277,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetThe Point Community Development Corporation — $275,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $271,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE MANILA RISING — $270,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS — $268,000 over 4y, 52% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $265,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOPAL — $250,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetLittle Village Environmental Justice Org — $247,500 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetEDUCATION ECONOMICS ENVIRONMENTAL CLIMATE AND HEAL — $245,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetSOULARDARITY — $240,000 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $240,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE — $240,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetHASER Inc — $235,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY ↗
  • Who funds UPROSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THUNDER VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE RENEWABLES INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Asian Pacific Environmental Network ↗
  • Who funds Strategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds UFW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA MARANA CORP ↗
  • Who funds Taproot Earth ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Climate & Energy Network ↗
  • Who funds Urban Tilth ↗
  • Who funds West Street Recovery ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLIER ↗
  • Who funds WECOUNT ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEO INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A JUST SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT ↗
  • Who funds Utah Dine Bikeyah ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR WASHINGTONS FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds Gasp ↗
  • Who funds WINNESHIEK ENERGY DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds One Voice ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDSWELL INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA WAND EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Point Community Development Corporation ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Windward FundAmalgamated Charitabl…United States Energy …Movement Strategy Cen…Social and Environmen…The Schmidt Family Fo…Common Counsel Founda…Natural Resources Def…Grassroots Internatio…PatagoniaorgSierra ClubThe Energy Foundation
Windward FundDC145.3× affinity100 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Windward Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Movement Strategy Center · Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Grassroots International Inc · Patagoniaorg · Sierra Club · The Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Solutions Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • Nopi Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Clinton Hill Community Action Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 345 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines