Skip to content
Nemeth Julius L Pfdn at a glance

· Private foundation

Nemeth Julius L Pfdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$68kArts & Culture$24kRecreation & Sports$20kYouth Development$16kInternational$12kHuman Services$10kEnvironment$10kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$546k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION$6,000
ART RESOURCES TRANSFORMATIONS$3,500
FIRST TEE OF AKRON$3,000
AKRON CIVIC THEATRE$2,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$2,000
AKRON ART MUSEUM$1,500
CROWN POINT ECOLOGY CENTER$1,000
WOMEN FOR GREATER AKRON CHARITIES$1,000
GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC$1,000
AKRON SNOW ANGELS$1,000
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON$1,000
FREEDOM PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS$1,000
OUR LADY OF THE ELMS$1,000
AKRON CANTON FOODBANK$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AKRON SNOW ANGELS: $1k → 7%COMMUNITY AIDS NETWORK: $1k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $2k → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $1k → 13%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC: $1k → 13%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON: $5k → 13%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON: $3k → 13%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON: $2k → 13%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON: $1k → 13%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON: $1k → 13%GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 20 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$166k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+14%

Still filing today

55%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +136%
  • GA
    GREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +17%
  • II
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +131%

Funded once

  • FS
    Fore Stark County Youth Development Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -3%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONAL HOUSE OF AKRON
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • CA
    Community AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initigraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akron Revitalization Committee Inc
Community Improvement
2
Alpha Phi Alpha Foundation of Akron
—
3
Leadership Akron

The mission of leadership akron is to inspire, strengthen, and empower leaders. our purpose is to unlock the potential of leaders and serve as a catalyst that drives them to create a greater akron.

Education
4
Akron Black Artist Guild

Exclusively for charitable, religious, educational

Arts & Culture
5
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
6
Akron Community Foundation

To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…

Philanthropy
7
Akron Soul Train

Akron soul train (ast) is a multidisciplinary residency program that provides 12-15 artists each year with paid residencies. our mission is to offer ohio-based visual, performing, and literary artists the space, time, and financial…

Arts & Culture
8
Akron Roundtable

Akron roundtable brings speakers to akron who inform, educate and stimulate listeners on topics of importance to the region, the country and the world.

—
9
Akron Aids Collaborative

The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…

Human Services
10
Akron Bar Foundation

The foundation supports the activities of the akron bar association under section 509(a)(3). the foundation also acts as the charitable arm of the akron bar association and provides scholarships to deserving law students.

Health
11
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank Endowment

To receive and maintain funds in order to ensure the future of the akron-canton regional foodbank.

Food & Nutrition
12
Keep Akron Beautiful

Keep akron beautiful improves the quality of life for city of akron, oh residents through the beautification of the city and through responsible environmental management.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Youth Mentorship; the most unlike its peers is Island Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION: $63,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,500 · EducationOUR LADY OF THE ELMS: $6,750 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE ELMSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAAKRON CIVIC THEATRE: $5,500 · OtherAKRON CIVIC THEATREIndividual grant recipient: $4,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKOHL FAMILY YMCA: $3,100 · OtherGREAT TRAIL COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF: $2,800 · OtherJAKES REACH: $3,500 · OtherJAKES REACHTHE KYM SELLERS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT: $2,000 · Other+21 more: $19,250 · Other+21 moreGREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER AK…Fore Stark County Youth Development Inc: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsFore Stark…+1 more: $500 · Recreation & SportsINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIO…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $3,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COM…Community AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi: $1,000 · Human ServicesCommunity …GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGRACE HOUS…Akron Snow Angels: $1,000 · Human ServicesAkron Snow…ART RESOURCES TRANSFORMATIONS: $12,500 · Arts & CultureAKRON ART MUSEUM: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCROWN POINT ECOLOGY CENTER: $8,500 · EnvironmentECOLOGY CENTER: $1,000 · EnvironmentAKRON YOUTH MENTORSHIP: $6,500 · Youth Development
Education$65,000Other$59,000Recreation & Sports$18,000Human Services$18,000Arts & Culture$15,000Environment$9,500Youth Development$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION: $63,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON: $15,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetART RESOURCES TRANSFORMATIONS: $12,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCROWN POINT ECOLOGY CENTER: $8,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAKRON YOUTH MENTORSHIP: $6,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetJAKES REACH: $3,500 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFore Stark County Youth Development Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAKRON ART MUSEUM: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KYM SELLERS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT: $2,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUECOATS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetECOLOGY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Paws Assistance Dogs: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANTON CHRISTIAN HOME INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA SCORES CLEVELAND: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Summit Medina and Stark Counties Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIRETOWN GOLF CHARITIES: $500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE LIPPMAN SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON ↗
  • Who funds ART RESOURCES TRANSFORMATIONS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC ↗
  • Who funds CROWN POINT ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AKRON YOUTH MENTORSHIP ↗
  • Who funds JAKES REACH ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON ↗
  • Who funds Fore Stark County Youth Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds AKRON ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE KYM SELLERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT ↗
  • Who funds Community AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi ↗
  • Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUECOATS INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKMONT ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGE ↗
  • Who funds ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Freedom Paws Assistance Dogs ↗
  • Who funds Women for Greater Akron Charities ↗
  • Who funds Akron Snow Angels ↗
  • Who funds CANTON CHRISTIAN HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community Found…Lloyd L & Louise K Sm…Charles E and Mabel M…L R Moffitt & L W Mof…Sisler McFawn Foundat…The Welty Family Foun…United Way of Summit …Mary S & David C Corb…Lehner Family Foundat…Gar FoundationGpd Group Employees F…Artsnow
Akron Community FoundationOH33.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · The Welty Family Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Gpd Group Employees Foundation Inc · Artsnow

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nemeth Julius L Pfdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nemeth Julius L Pfdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nemeth Julius L Pfdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home