· Private foundation
Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k85 grants · $414k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $639k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES | $65,000 |
| LEADERSHIP AKRON | $40,000 |
| AKRONCANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK | $35,000 |
| FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $32,000 |
| NEOMED | $30,000 |
| ACCESS | $28,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SUMMIT COUNTY | $25,000 |
| MAGICAL THEATRE COMPANY | $23,000 |
| OPEN M | $22,000 |
| AKRON CHILDRENS MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOUCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| MUSICAL ARTS ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| BUILDING FOR TOMORROW | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $890k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
164 repeat relationships — 114 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES6× · 2020–2025 · $390k · revenue +31%
- LALEADERSHIP AKRON6× · 2020–2025 · $188k · revenue +35%
- ARAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK6× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- FOFriends of Glendale Cemeteryone grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEASTone grant, 2021 · $20k
- MCMEDINA COUNTY BATTERED WOMENone grant, 2022 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To promote business in the tri-county area
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…
Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.
The mission of the Akron History Center is to create an enduring long-lasting free museum-quality exhibit about Akrons history that inspires residents educates young people and welcomes visitors to our community.
The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through the former akron global business accelerator and to secure state of ohio funding for technology-based…
The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.
To help individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and emotional stability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Help Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ge Aerospace Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
146 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 146 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP AKRON ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SUMMIT AND MEDINA ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds AKRON CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BUILDING FOR TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds THE WELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF AKRON OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MAGICAL THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds UNITED DISABILITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT EDUCATION INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER & URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds EMBRACING FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL AID SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SUMMIT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO ↗
- Who funds CUYAHOGA VALLEY ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AKRON ZOOLOGICAL PARK ↗
- Who funds AKRON ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
- Who funds VANTAGE AGING ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
- Who funds LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREENLEAF FAMILY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Gar Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · W Paul Mills & Thora J Mills Memorial · Northern Ohio Golf Charities Foundation Inc · Glenn R & Alice V Boggess Memorial · United Way of Summit and Medina
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sheltercare — 18% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.