· Private foundation
Nemeth Julius L Pfdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| ART RESOURCES TRANSFORMATIONS | $3,500 |
| FIRST TEE OF AKRON | $3,000 |
| AKRON CIVIC THEATRE | $2,500 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $2,000 |
| AKRON ART MUSEUM | $1,500 |
| FRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT | $1,000 |
| AKRON CANTON FOODBANK | $1,000 |
| OUR LADY OF THE ELMS | $1,000 |
| ISLAND FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| CROWN POINT ECOLOGY CENTER | $1,000 |
| WOMEN FOR GREATER AKRON CHARITIES | $1,000 |
| GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC | $1,000 |
| AKRON SNOW ANGELS | $1,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +136%
- GAGREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +17%
- IIINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +131%
Funded once
- FSFore Stark County Youth Development Incone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -3%
- RMRONALD MCDONAL HOUSE OF AKRONone grant, 2020 · $2k
- OAOAKMONT ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGEone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -95%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of leadership akron is to inspire, strengthen, and empower leaders. our purpose is to unlock the potential of leaders and serve as a catalyst that drives them to create a greater akron.
Exclusively for charitable, religious, educational
To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…
To identify, activate, and support informed and passionate philanthropists who strive to improve the quality of life in our community. we accomplish this by:- building a permanent source of charitable funding- cultivating strategic…
Akron soul train (ast) is a multidisciplinary residency program that provides 12-15 artists each year with paid residencies. our mission is to offer ohio-based visual, performing, and literary artists the space, time, and financial…
Akron roundtable brings speakers to akron who inform, educate and stimulate listeners on topics of importance to the region, the country and the world.
The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…
The foundation supports the activities of the akron bar association under section 509(a)(3). the foundation also acts as the charitable arm of the akron bar association and provides scholarships to deserving law students.
To receive and maintain funds in order to ensure the future of the akron-canton regional foodbank.
Keep akron beautiful improves the quality of life for city of akron, oh residents through the beautification of the city and through responsible environmental management.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Youth Mentorship and the most unlike its peers is Island Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER AKRON FORE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC FORMERLY THE FIRST TEE OF AKRON ↗
- Who funds ART RESOURCES TRANSFORMATIONS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AKRON INC ↗
- Who funds CROWN POINT ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds AKRON YOUTH MENTORSHIP ↗
- Who funds JAKES REACH ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF AKRON ↗
- Who funds AKRON ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Fore Stark County Youth Development Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SUMMIT ↗
- Who funds THE KYM SELLERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Akron Snow Angels ↗
- Who funds OAKMONT ACADEMIC KNOWLEDGE ↗
- Who funds BLUECOATS INC ↗
- Who funds Women for Greater Akron Charities ↗
- Who funds ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community AIDS NetworkAkron Pride Initi ↗
- Who funds AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds Freedom Paws Assistance Dogs ↗
- Who funds GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC ↗
- Who funds CANTON CHRISTIAN HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Charles E and Mabel M Ritchie Memorial · L R Moffitt & L W Moffitt Foundation · Sisler McFawn Foundation Pfdn · The Welty Family Foundation · United Way of Summit and Medina · Mary S & David C Corbin Foundation · Lehner Family Foundation · Gar Foundation · Gpd Group Employees Foundation Inc · Artsnow
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nemeth Julius L Pfdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.