How much did MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 91% of MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

clinic healthhealth system

2019

madisonmcfclinic healthhealth systemadvance

2020

marathonconstructionwaycolumbuspost

2021

—

2022

housing shelterstratfordsports leisuremauwyouthparks recreation

2023

housing shelterreligionsports leisuremauwparks recreationhealth

2024

auburndalesports leisuremauwyouthparks recreationhealth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $67k
$10k–50k12 grants · $210k
$50k–250k3 grants · $297k
$250k+1 grant · $544k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$19M

Total assets

Largest grants

MARSHFIELD PARKS & RECREATION$543,584
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARSHFIELD$127,722
CITY OF MARSHFIELD$103,816
CITY OF MARSHFIELD$65,556
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$39,500
MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY$36,731
MARSHFIELD HIGH SCHOOL$25,256
LUCILLE TACK CENTER FOR THE ARTS$15,500
MARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$15,064
ANGELO LUPPINO INC$15,000
MARSHFIELD TIGER HOCKEY BLUELINE CLUB$12,000
COLUMBUS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,966
VILLAGE OF AUBURNDALE$10,000
HANNAH CENTER$10,000
AUBURNDALE PARK ASSOCIATION$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$16M · 30 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$16M

$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+26%

Still filing today

33%

21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MA
MARSHFIELD AREA PET SHELTER INC
6× · 2019–2024 · $341k · revenue +122%
MA
MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY
8× · 2017–2024 · $254k · revenue +12%
MA
MARSHFIELD AREA YMCA
3× · 2020–2022 · $66k · revenue +66%

Funded once

DN
DON NIKOLAI CONSTRUCTION
one grant, 2020 · $956k
FF
FOREVER FUND
one grant, 2021 · $70k
SC
SCHERRER CONSTRUCTION CO INC
one grant, 2020 · $56k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Marshfield Food Pantry Inc

To serve the emergency food needs of marshfield residents and to provide ongoing spplement to their monthly food needs

Food & Nutrition

Marshfield Senior Center

To help senior citizens

—

Marshall County Nonprofit Partnership Foundation

—

Marshall Community Fund Inc

Philanthropy

Marshall County Agricultural Association

The association sponsors and manages the Marshall County Fair which provides an opportunity for county citizens to fraternize and promote 4H activities.

Recreation & Sports

Marshwood Foundation

Philanthropy

Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc

Connecting people who care with causes that matter to enrich the quality of life in the marshfield area.

Philanthropy

Richfield Community Center

—

Marshall Home for Men Inc

Provides lodging, food, and care for elderly or infirm men.

Human Services

Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc

Mary's center embraces all communities and provides high-quality healthcare, education, and social services to build better futures.

—

Margaret Mary Community Hospital Inc

Improve the health of the communities it serves.

Health

Martha's Farm Animal Sanctuary

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Health System and the most unlike its peers is Lucille Tack Center for the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 27. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 5% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

21/465

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

12/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$16,291,027Health$752,569Animals$341,082Philanthropy$285,089Human Services$124,415Public Benefit$64,168Community Improvement$22,476

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Umhoefer Foundation IncWI24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Umhoefer Foundation Inc · Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc · Marshfield Area United Way · Weber Charitable Foundation · Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Green Bay Community · Community Foundation Of · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~69 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 391816221 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MARSHFIELD AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 69 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph