How much did MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY grant in FY2024?

Human Services$1.3MHealth$459kCommunity Improvement$317kYouth Development$165kCrime & Legal$85kHousing & Shelter$73kPhilanthropy$8kEducation$5kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$1.5M

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k9 grants · $285k
$50k–250k2 grants · $200k

$38,750

Median grant

States reached

$1.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES$100,000
PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER$100,000
NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM$47,250
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS$41,125
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC (HOME DELIVERED MEALS)$40,960
SOUP OR SOCKS PANTRY$38,750
MEMORY LANE FARM$35,250
MARSHFIELD AREA RESPITE CARE CENTER$32,000
CHILDCARING INC$23,750
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARSHFIELD$13,875
SPENCER KIDS GROUP$12,500
HART EQUINE THERAPEUTIC CENTER$5,250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.9M · 15 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.9M

$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%

+52%

Still filing today

73%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PD
PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $828k · revenue +86%
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN COMMUNITY SERVICES
8× · 2017–2024 · $706k · revenue +63%
NC
NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM
8× · 2017–2024 · $317k · revenue +50%

Funded once

SV
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SHELTERgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +123%
TC
THE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY OUTREACHgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +71%
HC
HANNAH CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Care Centers of Marshfield Inc

To provide a child care center and a child and adult care food program

Human Services

Marshfield Senior Center

To help senior citizens

—

Marshall County Council On Aging

Care for senior citizens

—

Hospice of Marshall County Inc

Providing hospice care

—

Ssm Health Care of Wisconsin Inc

Part of an integrated network providing health care in south central wisconsin operating three hospitals and two skilled nursing facilities.

Health

Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc

Mary's center embraces all communities and provides high-quality healthcare, education, and social services to build better futures.

—

Madison Area Rehabilitation Centers Inc

Marc, inc. provides day services, supported employment services, and pre-vocational services to more than 320 adults with developmental and intellectual disabilities in dane-sauk counties. marc programs assist with personal care and…

—

The Marshall County Home Place Inc

Housing for the homeless

Housing & Shelter

Marshfield Food Pantry Inc

To serve the emergency food needs of marshfield residents and to provide ongoing spplement to their monthly food needs

Food & Nutrition

Wisconsin Community Services Inc

Wisconsin community services advocates for justice and community safety, providing innovative opportunities for individuals to overcome adversity.

Crime & Legal

Marshfield Clinic Health System

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health

Margaret Mary Community Hospital Inc

Improve the health of the communities it serves.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marshfield Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

11/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,558,415Human Services$1,328,285Health$458,836Community Improvement$316,750Youth Development$164,780Crime & Legal$84,875Housing & Shelter$73,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marshfield Area Community Foundation IncWI18.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marshfield Area Community Foundation Inc · Umhoefer Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Weber Charitable Foundation · Nelson-Jameson Foundation Inc · United Way of Marathon County Inc · Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc · Community Foundation Of · Otto Bremer Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MEMORY LANE FARM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832682373 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MEMORY LANE FARM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 37% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Marshfield Area United Way?

Find your warmest path to Marshfield Area United Way through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marshfield Area United Way?

More from the funding graph

MARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marshfield Area United Way?

More from the funding graph