· Private foundation
Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k24 grants · $16k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF STEVENS POINT | $100,000 |
| SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION | $3,750 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD AND ADAMS | $2,650 |
| ACACIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCON | $2,500 |
| CAMP LUWISOMO | $1,200 |
| SHERMALOT SKI SHOW TEAM | $525 |
| ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH | $500 |
| NECEDAH AREA SCHOOL DISTR | $500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $500 |
| SOUTH WOOD COUNTY RECREATION CENTER | $500 |
| WISCONSIN RAPIDS COMMUNITY THEATRE | $450 |
| PLOVER-WHITING YOUTH ATHLETICS INC | $400 |
| AMERICAN LEGION POST 9 | $300 |
| CENTRAL WI GIFT OF LIFE | $250 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 2% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 30 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $24k · revenue +44%
- ODOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC3× · 2019–2022 · $11k · revenue +17%
- IGIMPACT100 GREATER WAUSAU INC2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INCone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -86%
- CWCENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INCone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +3%
- WVWISCONSIN VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIALone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote community awareness through sport activities. the organization also sponsors the badger state games (winter and summer) and other events. these events attract thousands of competitors and visitors from across the state and…
To foster the vitality of rural wisconsin, primarily through the promotion of education, improvement of health care services, cultural experiences, and support of the rural economic base.
To raise scholarship money for students and raise the awareness of the campus and all of the activities on campus
Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.
Wisconsin progress institute exists to empower wisconsin's locally elected leaders with the tools, training, and support they need to be effective, values-driven public servants.
To improve the quality of life by providing resources and services within our communities.
We enhance the well-being of people of all ages with disabilities across wisconsin through the management of special needs trusts by promoting more choice and opportunities.
The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
To promote the welfare of the university of wisconsin stevens point at wausau and provide funds in the form of student scholarships, faculty grants and support to the university.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greater Wausau Prosperity Partnership L Partnership Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS CAMPUS INC ↗
- Who funds SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT100 GREATER WAUSAU INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WAUSAU PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP L PARTNERSHIP LTD ↗
- Who funds WOODSON YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH WOOD COUNTY RECREATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds Camp LuWiSoMo Inc ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PORTAGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds PLOVER-WHITING YOUTH ATHLETICS INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds South Wood County Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Incourage Community Foundation Inc · Judd S Alexander Foundation · Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc · Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Dwight and Linda Davis Foundation · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.