Skip to content
Neisloss Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Neisloss Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$613k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MInternational$526kPhilanthropy$121kEducation$90kHuman Services$70kAnimals$58kArts & Culture$53kReligion$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$8,050
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FDN$375,000
WORLDWIDE ORPHANS$125,000
WAGS AND WALKS ADOPTION CENTER$25,000
HARMONY PROJECT$15,000
GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ALZHEIMERS LOS ANGELES$10,000
VISTA DEL MAR CHILD & FAMILY$10,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$8,050
NEXT FOR AUTISM$5,297
AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS$5,000
CENTER FOR SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS$3,000
USC SHOAH FOUNDATION AMBASSADORS GALA$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS GREATER LA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD & FAMILY: $10k → 14%EAST END HOSPICE: $1k → 7%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD & FAMILY: $10k → 14%LAST MILE 4D: $10k → 14%LAST MILE 4D: $2k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD & FAMILY: $5k → 14%THE JEWISH BOARD: $1k → 17%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 25 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
27

Total granted

$2.8M
$268k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WORLDWIDE ORPHANS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $508k · revenue +58%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $506k · revenue +25%
  • HP
    Harmony Project
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -28%
  • FA
    FRIENDS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • FI
    FEINSTEIN INSTITUES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
5
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
6
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
7
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
8
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
12
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Perfect Pet Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWELL HEALTH INC: $1,110,000 · Community ImprovementNORTHWELL HEALTH INCCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $505,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $381,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDA…+3 more: $34,297 · HealthWORLDWIDE ORPHANS FOUNDATION: $508,000 · EducationWORLDWIDE ORPHANS FOUN…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN…Harmony Project: $40,000 · EducationHarmony ProjectFRIENDS ACADEMY: $30,000 · Education+2 more: $7,500 · EducationWAGS AND WALKS ADOPTION CENTER: $45,500 · OtherWAGS AND WA…CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $29,825 · OtherCENTRAL SYN…FEINSTEIN INSTITUES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $25,000 · OtherFEINSTEIN I…GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $22,500 · OtherGUIDE DOG F…STANLEY'S GARDEN: $17,818 · OtherSTANLEY'S G…Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGURY: $13,500 · OtherTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER LA: $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $15,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $11,000 · Other+30 more: $115,618 · Other+30 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25,000 · Human ServicesLAST MILE4D: $11,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $9,500 · Human Services+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesTETIAROA SOCIETY: $20,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 · Environment
Community Improvement$1,110,000Health$920,797Education$629,250Other$323,261Philanthropy$105,500Human Services$48,000Environment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLDWIDE ORPHANS FOUNDATION: $508,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $505,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $381,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $43,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $40,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS ACADEMY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTETIAROA SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetLAST MILE4D: $11,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $11,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPERFECT PET RESCUE: $10,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEACE OVER VIOLENCE: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELIJA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetKIND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR SUPPORTIVE SCHOOLS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadison Square Boys & Girls Club: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE FOR VETS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Foun…California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Network for Good
Jewish Communal FundNY17.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neisloss Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neisloss Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Center for Supportive Schools Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Neisloss Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Neisloss Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Neisloss Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home