Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Neighborhood Risk Management Corp

Nrmc was established to provide risk reduction and loss mitigation services and educational programs to its members so that they in turn can learn to reduce their loss-related expenses and devote more of their limited resources to their affordable housing missions.

$1.5M
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
10
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $1,439,220 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,509,384 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,164 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $223k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $199k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$21,309
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$1,000,000
MADISON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP$83,687
CODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP$64,398
ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY$51,133
SOUTHWEST HOUSING SOLUTIONS$36,857
THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC$31,947
COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE (CBA)$28,252
NEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORP$25,654
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF CHICAGO$21,309
AVENUE CDC$16,947
EAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELO$16,093
NEIGHBORWORKS BLACKSTONE RIVER VALLEY$12,870
HUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC$11,714
NEIGHBORWORKS HOME SOLUTIONS$10,937
TROY REHABILITATION & IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC$10,419
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE (CBA): $28k → 8%THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC: $32k → 16%HUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC: $12k → 9%TROY REHABILITATION & IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC: $10k → 11%ARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT: $9k → 13%ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY: $51k → 17%AVENUE CDC: $17k → 16%NEIGHBORWORKS HOME SOLUTIONS: $11k → 12%SOUTHWEST HOUSING SOLUTIONS: $37k → 21%NEIGHBORWORKS BLACKSTONE RIVER VALLEY: $13k → 14%SOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%EAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELO: $16k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF CHICAGO: $21k → 14%NEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORP: $26k → 15%CONSORTIUM OF HOUSING: $1.0M → 16%CODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP: $64k → 16%MADISON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORP: $84k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
RI
KY
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Housing Services of Waco

Building stronger neighborhoods through homeownership, quality rental housing and community building initiatives.

Housing & Shelter
2
Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
3
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

4
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Orleans Inc

Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…

5
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Britain

The corporation is engaged in encouraging the cooperative efforts of neighborhood representatives, government and participating lending institutions in a combined effort to stem the decline and deterioration of the housing within the city…

Housing & Shelter
6
Sacramento Neighborhood Housing Services Inc

To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.

Housing & Shelter
7
Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter
8
Neighborhood Housing Services of Hamilton Inc

Neighborhood housing services of hamilton, inc. is a nonprofit community development organization dedicated to building affordable, healthier, and stronger communities through partnerships with government, businesses, and local community…

Housing & Shelter
9
Innovative Housing Inc

Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
10
Howard Street Development Corporation

To provide housing for low income persons, and to support tenderloin neighborhood development corporation in carrying out its purpose.

Housing & Shelter
11
Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc

To develop, finance, and advocate for affordable housing at scale that promotes racial equity and healthy communities where families thrive.

Housing & Shelter
12
Neighborhoods Inc

Neighborworks lincoln revitalizes neighborhoods and supports homeownership keeping lincoln a safe and prosperous community.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arbor Housing and Development and the most unlike its peers is South Bend Heritage Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC — $51,133 · Other+5 more — $101,255 · Other+5 moreMADISON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $83,687 · Housing & ShelterMADISON PARK DEV…THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC — $31,947 · Housing & ShelterTHE NEIGHBORHOOD…COALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE INC — $28,252 · Housing & ShelterCOALITION FOR A …NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF CHICAGO INC — $21,309 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD HOU…Avenue Community Development Corporation — $16,947 · Housing & ShelterAvenue Community…WOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,870 · Housing & ShelterWOONSOCKET NEIGH…TROY REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $10,419 · Housing & ShelterCODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $64,398 · Community ImprovementSOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $7,973 · Community ImprovementARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT — $9,030 · Health
Other$1,152,388Housing & Shelter$205,431Community Improvement$72,371Health$9,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMADISON PARK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $83,687 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $64,398 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC — $51,133 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST HOUSING SOLUTIONS — $36,857 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC — $31,947 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR A BETTER ACRE INC — $28,252 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION — $25,654 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF CHICAGO INC — $21,309 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation — $16,947 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,870 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUDSON RIVER HOUSING INC — $11,714 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTROY REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $10,419 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARBOR HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT — $9,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC — $7,973 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Neighborhood Reinvestment CorporationDC34.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Third Sector New England Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Neighborhood Risk Management Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • The Neighborhood Developers Inc3% of income from government
  • Madison Park Development Corporation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Neighborhood Risk Management Corp?

Find your warmest path to Neighborhood Risk Management Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph