· Public charity
Nebraska Humanities Council
Humanities nebraska helps nebraskans explore what connects us and makes us human.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $698,540 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,088,735 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $390,195 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $98k
- $250k+1 grant · $516k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR THE | $516,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT LINCOLN | $22,005 |
| NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| AFRICAN CULTURE CONNECTION | $15,000 |
| VISION MAKER MEDIA | $13,800 |
| OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS | $12,400 |
| THE DURHAM MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| ELKHORN VALLEY MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| THE HOUSE OF AFROS | $9,700 |
| NEBRASKA NATIONAL GUARD MUSEUM | $8,900 |
| WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION | $8,770 |
| BEMIS CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART | $7,600 |
| LINCOLN CROSSROADS MUSIC FESTIVAL | $7,500 |
| NEBRASKA WRITERS COLLECTIVE | $7,000 |
| TOGETHER WE ACHIEVE MIRACLES INC | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR THE HUMANITIES3× · 2021–2025 · $970k · revenue +39% · 77% of their budget
- NWNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +21%
- TWTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +194%
Funded once
- CNCELEBRATING NEBRASKA STATEHOOD INCone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -99%
- TDTHE DURHAM MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue +40%
- NHNebraska History Museumone grant, 2020 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Northeastern nevada historcial society is dedicated to the preservation of the hertitage, culture, and natural history of northeastern nevada. our ongoing goals are to establish a western art center and nourish the western culture that…
Museum depicting history of richardson county, nebraska
Public museum dedicated to the collection, preservation, promotion, and exhibition of the history, pre-history, natural history, and cultural heritage of north central nevada.
The nebraska state historical society foundation's mission is to support the preservation, interpretation and appreciation of nebraska history.
Humanities nebraska helps nebraskans explore what connects us and makes us human.
The purposeof the museum of the plains is to preserve significant objects of the past. the museum fo the plains is an encyclopedic history museum established to bring about a better understanding and appreciation by the community and…
The acquisition, preservation and educational display of objects relating to the history of eureka and humboldt county's heritage.
The organization is dedicated to preserving, restoring and educating others about the history of the region.
Preserve and protect cultural, historical, and scientific items to foster and to promote learning of kimball county, nebraska culture and history.
Services include providing public with educational resources including research, maps, photos, and historical news of adams county, nebraska.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hastings Museum and the most unlike its peers is Harold Warp Pioneer Village Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEBRASKA FOUNDATION FOR THE HUMANITIES ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CULTURE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds INCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA WRITERS COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds EL MUSEO LATINO ↗
- Who funds NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT PLAINS THEATRE COMMONS ↗
- Who funds BEMIS CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN G NEIHARDT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NET FOUNDATION FOR RADIO ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MIDWEST THEATER ↗
- Who funds JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIC AIR COMMAND & AEROSPACE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LEGACY OF THE PLAINS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds STUHR MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Washington County Historical Association ↗
- Who funds KREGEL WINDMILL FACTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CROSSROADS FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds DAWSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE ACHIEVE MIRACLES INC ↗
- Who funds HISTORY NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLATWATER SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT PLAINS BLACK HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE TRI-FAITH INITIATIVE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATING NEBRASKA STATEHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds KANEKO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Lozier Foundation · Cooper Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Nac Development Corporation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Annette and Paul Smith Charitable Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nebraska Humanities Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.