How much did NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE grant in FY2024?

NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE reported 24 grants totaling $629,981 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE based?

NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE is based in VA.

NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE

National voad, an association of organizations that mitigate and alleviate the impact of disasters, provides a forum promoting cooperation, communication, coordination and collaboration; and fosters more effective delivery of services to communities affected by disaster.

$630k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$51k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

meanscompassionaffordablecarepreparednesshumanitarianresponse recovery

2019

residingrelief benefitbenefit personsparthfhivolunteershabitat humanity

2020

conferencechristresponsecatholicreliefrecovery

2021

insurancerebuildseeparthfhivolunteershabitat humanity

2022

church

2023

lowe's reconstructionreconstruction springreconstruction summer

2024

lowe's fallfall adminlowe's helenehelene miltonmilton adminups ltrlowe's winter

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k20 grants · $82k
$10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$50k–250k1 grant · $51k

$3,500

Median grant

States reached

$996k

Total assets

Largest grants

DISASTER SERVICES CORPORATION SVDP USA$51,400
ENDEAVORS$14,900
FULLER CENTER DISASTER REBUILDERS INC$14,900
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES$11,540
CONVOY OF HOPE$9,734
MARYLAND VOAD$9,200
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS-SMART RESPONSE$9,033
PUERTO RICO VOAD$8,333
GUARDIAN ANGEL MINISTRIES INC$5,700
BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION$4,900
NC BAPTIST MENBAPTISTS ON MISSION$3,640
NORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE$3,500
PRESBYTERIAN DISASTER ASSISTANCE$3,500
LOUISIANA BAPTIST CONVENTION$3,500
MISSIONARY DISASTER RESPONSE$3,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 11%. 17% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$57M · 19 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$57M

$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%

+83%

Still filing today

68%

58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Public Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SU
SVDP USA
5× · 2018–2024 · $20M · revenue +27% · 52% of their budget
ICNA RELIEF USA
3× · 2018–2020 · $7.6M · revenue +234%
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS-SMART RESPONSE
5× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +13%

Funded once

JC
JEFFERSON COUNTY LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP
one grant, 2019 · $44k · revenue -92%
GV
GEORGIA VOAD
one grant, 2022 · $25k
VV
VI VOAD INC
one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Habitat for Humanity for Georgetown County Sc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity - St Louis

See schedule o. seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity International

Build affordable homes for qualified families

—

Habitat for Humanity South Carolina

State support org expands capacity of 29 affiliates. Leadership body leverages collective impact to improve home affordability via advocacy,resources,education &disaster svcs. Affiliates have built/repaired 4,800 homes in 37 counties since…

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—

Habitat for Humanity of Puerto Rico Inc

A non for profit organization that works in partnership with donors, volunteers, and homeowners of all backgrounds, to build, remodel and rehabilitate decent and affordable housing for those in need.

—

Habitat for Humanity

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter

Rebuilding Together Houston

Repairing Homes. Revitalizing Communities. Rebuilding Lives.

Housing & Shelter

HomeAid Hawaii

To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction.

Housing & Shelter

Habitat for Humanity International

Dedicated to eliminating substandard housing through constructing, rehabilitating and preserving homes; by advocating for fair and just housing policies; and by providing training and access to resources to help families improve their…

—

Crisis Response International

To resource, train, & mobilize organizations to respond to disasters in the us & world-wide

Public Safety & Disaster

World Renew

World Renew's mission is to engage God's people in redeeming resources and developing gifts in collaborative acts of mercy, justice, and compassion. This work, which is focused on relief and community development.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of South Carolina and the most unlike its peers is Convoy of Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%2/76

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,489

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

42/46

Grantees still filing

30/46

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$29,455,631Public Safety & Disaster$27,593,742Philanthropy$55,750Human Services$43,305International$40,450Housing & Shelter$32,950Religion$15,500Community Improvement$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The St Bernard Project IncLA28.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The St Bernard Project Inc · Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc · Center for Disaster Philanthropy Inc · Good360 · Foundation for the Carolinas · Central Carolina Community · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Rebuilding Together Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Southwest · The Onestar Foundation · THDF II Inc DBA

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PUERTO RICO VOAD.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 660792928 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PUERTO RICO VOAD, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 87% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to National Voluntary Organizations Active?

Find your warmest path to National Voluntary Organizations Active through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Voluntary Organizations Active?

More from the funding graph

NATIONAL VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

46 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Voluntary Organizations Active?

More from the funding graph