Skip to content
National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc

National domestic workers alliance (ndwa) is the leading voice for the millions of domestic workers in the united states and works to win them respect, dignity and labor protections.

$7.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$18MHuman Services$8.9MCivil Rights$7.5MHealth$3.5MEducation$1.6MHousing & Shelter$1.2MInternational$1.1MSocial Science$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.3M
$62,600
Median grant
—
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Caring Across Generations Inc$4,286,044
Hand in Hand$240,000
Caring Majority Rising$200,000
Carroll Gardens Association Inc$188,385
Damayan Migrant Workers Association$140,600
Adhikaar$122,600
NM Caregivers Coalition$120,000
Casa Latina$113,400
Miami Workers Center$110,600
Arriba Las Vegas Worker Center$103,200
Pilipino Workers' Center$94,648
El Centro de Igualdad y Derechos$90,800
Hispanic Resource Center dba Community Resource Center$90,400
Border Workers United$81,600
WeCount Inc$81,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $45k → 11%FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $250k → 10%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER OF MAMARONECK: $66k → 9%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $110k → 14%FAMILY VALUES AT WORK: $760k → 17%CONNECTICUT WORKER CENTER: $40k → 9%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $50k → 8%LATINO UNION: $65k → 14%PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT: $35k → 11%FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $30k → 10%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER OF MAMARONECK: $60k → 9%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $80k → 14%CONNECTICUT WORKER CENTER: $40k → 9%LATINO UNION: $40k → 14%FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $30k → 10%HISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT & MAMARONECK INC DBA COMMUNITY RE: $40k → 9%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $80k → 14%CONNECTICUT WORKER CENTER: $30k → 9%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $221k → 10%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $75k → 14%UNIDAD LATINA EN ACCION (ULA): $70k → 12%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $210k → 10%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $66k → 14%UNIDAD LATINA EN ACCION (ULA): $40k → 12%HATIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $85k → 10%CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC WORKERS COALITION: $200k → 10%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $55k → 14%JANE ADAMS SENIOR CAUCUS: $40k → 14%HATIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $50k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $190k → 10%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO: $50k → 14%CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC WORKERS COALITION: $150k → 10%CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC WORKERS COALITION: $150k → 10%AYUDA: $64k → 21%LATINO UNION: $35k → 14%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $105k → 10%BRAZILLIAN WORKERS CENTER: $88k → 16%BRAZILLIAN WORKERS CENTER: $59k → 16%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $85k → 10%BRAZILIAN WORKERS CENTER: $40k → 16%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $80k → 10%BRAZILLIAN WORKERS CENTER: $35k → 16%BRAZILLIAN WORKERS CENTER: $35k → 16%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $73k → 10%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $820k → 14%BRAZILLIAN WOMEN'S GROUP: $53k → 16%BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP: $40k → 16%BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP: $40k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 79 repeat orgs$8.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

79 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

79
54

Total granted

$37M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+16%

Still filing today

85%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsEmploymentEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Mujeres Unidas y Activas
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +131%
  • MW
    Miami Workers Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $926k · revenue +48%
  • BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $854k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES
    one grant, 2021 · $820k · revenue -4%
  • ME
    MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $760k
  • IF
    INEVITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $515k · revenue +24% · 30% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
4
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
5
Towards Justice of Colorado

Towards justice is a nonprofit law firm that seeks to advance economic equity and worker power through impact litigation, strategic policy advocacy, and collaboration with organizers and public agencies. we were founded in response to the…

Civil Rights
6
Center for Workers' Rights

The center for workers' rights strives to improve working conditions, reduce barriers to securing employment, and remedy workplace injustices for low wage workers in the greater sacramento area.

Employment
7
Chicago Workers' Collaborative Nfp

Chicago Workers' Collaborative's mission is to promote full employment and equality for the lowest wage-earners, primarily temporary staffing workers, in the Chicago region through leadership and skills training, critical assistance and…

Education
8
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
9
LaborLab

LaborLab is a nonprofit watchdog dedicated to safeguarding workers rights to organize, win strong contracts, and build lasting collective power. Through strategic research, educational resources, and corporate accountability, we empower…

Human Services
10
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
11
National Day Laborer Organizing Network

Improving the lives of day laborers in the united states. national day labor organizing network (ndlon) unifies and strengthens the day laborer community to be more strategic and effective in developing leadership, educating and organizing…

Civil Rights
12
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Community Change Action; the most unlike its peers is Lynn Worker Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
115/118
Grantees still filing
81/118
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAIR CARE LABS LLC: $13,945,898 · OtherFAIR CARE LABS LLCCaring Across Generations Inc: $4,286,044 · OtherCaring Across Generations Inc+61 more: $9,565,680 · Other+61 moreMujeres Unidas y Activas: $1,593,530 · Human ServicesMujeres Unidas y…THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $820,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE U…FAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM: $789,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VALUES WO…EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $445,800 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE IGU…FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $422,410 · Human ServicesFILIPINO ADVOCAT…Brazilian Worker Center Inc: $388,590 · Human ServicesBrazilian Worker…HISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT/MAMARONECK INC: $334,590 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $306,890 · Human ServicesLatino Union of Chicago: $287,140 · Human ServicesBRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP INC: $229,740 · Human Services+14 more: $941,100 · Human Services+14 moreDAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC: $604,290 · Civil RightsARRIBA LAS VEGAS WORKER CENTER: $363,200 · Civil RightsFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER: $350,379 · Civil RightsWECOUNT: $341,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $219,760 · Civil RightsTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION: $195,000 · Civil RightsJEWS FOR RACIAL & ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $150,000 · Civil RightsResistencia en Accion New Jersey: $140,000 · Civil RightsFIRST SHIFT JUSTICE PROJECT: $105,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTURY FOUNDATION INC: $101,334 · Civil Rights+8 more: $205,000 · Civil RightsCASA LATINA: $641,850 · EducationBRAVERHOOD LTD: $542,500 · EducationMoveOnorg Civic Action: $540,000 · EducationTHE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $312,500 · EducationCentro Laboral de Graton: $290,440 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $132,048 · Education+3 more: $65,000 · EducationMiami Workers Center Inc: $926,430 · EmploymentNEW MEXICO CAREGIVERS COALITION: $455,000 · EmploymentARISE CHICAGO: $389,840 · EmploymentFair Work Center: $244,000 · EmploymentPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $105,700 · EmploymentBELOVED COMMUNITY INCUBATOR INC: $95,000 · Employment+5 more: $130,000 · EmploymentPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $756,638 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $462,420 · Community ImprovementWOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $282,390 · Community ImprovementNAUGATUCK VALLEY PROJECT INC: $165,400 · Community ImprovementDMIA INC: $164,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $60,700 · Community ImprovementBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $854,463 · PhilanthropyINEVITABLE FOUNDATION: $515,000 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $249,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $55,200 · Philanthropy
Other$27,797,622Human Services$6,558,790Civil Rights$2,774,963Education$2,524,338Employment$2,345,970Community Improvement$1,891,548Philanthropy$1,673,663

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMujeres Unidas y Activas: $1,593,530 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetMiami Workers Center Inc: $926,430 over 8y, 14% of budgetNEW AMERICA FOUNDATION: $860,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $854,463 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: $846,230 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $820,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetFAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM: $789,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN: $756,638 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $720,030 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetCASA LATINA: $641,850 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetDAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC: $604,290 over 8y, 31% of budgetMISSION ACTION INC: $594,150 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetBRAVERHOOD LTD: $542,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMoveOnorg Civic Action: $540,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetINEVITABLE FOUNDATION: $515,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetCARROLL GARDENS ASSOCIATION INC: $483,975 over 8y, 18% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $462,420 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO CAREGIVERS COALITION: $455,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetEL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $445,800 over 6y, 12% of budgetFILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $422,410 over 8y, 13% of budgetARISE CHICAGO: $389,840 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetBrazilian Worker Center Inc: $388,590 over 7y, 8.5% of budgetARRIBA LAS VEGAS WORKER CENTER: $363,200 over 5y, 14% of budgetFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER: $350,379 over 6y, 18% of budgetAlliance of Filipinos for Immigrant Rights and Empowerment: $343,473 over 8y, 15% of budgetWECOUNT: $341,000 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetHISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT/MAMARONECK INC: $334,590 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetTHE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $312,500 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $306,890 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetCentro Laboral de Graton: $290,440 over 6y, 14% of budgetLatino Union of Chicago: $287,140 over 8y, 13% of budgetWOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC: $282,390 over 7y, 69% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $277,313 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRO HUMANITARIO PARA LOS TRABAJADORES: $272,300 over 7y, 12% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $249,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFair Work Center: $244,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetESPERANZA PEACE AND JUSTICE CENTER: $242,910 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetCENTRO CULTURAL DE MEXICO EN EL CONDADO DE ORANGE: $242,400 over 5y, 12% of budgetBRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP INC: $229,740 over 7y, 17% of budgetCITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN INC: $220,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $219,760 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS: $204,586 over 5y, 19% of budgetBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION: $195,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetINSTITUTO DE EDUCACION POPULAR DEL SUR DE CALIFORNIA: $182,250 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetMe Too International Inc: $180,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetURBAN CONCEPTS INCORPORATED: $172,600 over 3y, 63% of budgetNAUGATUCK VALLEY PROJECT INC: $165,400 over 4y, 26% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mujeres Unidas y Activas ↗
  • Who funds Miami Workers Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds ADHIKAAR FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN ↗
  • Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA LATINA ↗
  • Who funds DAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVERHOOD LTD ↗
  • Who funds MoveOnorg Civic Action ↗
  • Who funds INEVITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL GARDENS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CAREGIVERS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS ↗
  • Who funds FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds ARISE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Brazilian Worker Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARRIBA LAS VEGAS WORKER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Alliance of Filipinos for Immigrant Rights and Empowerment ↗
  • Who funds WECOUNT ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT/MAMARONECK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Centro Laboral de Graton ↗
  • Who funds Latino Union of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO HUMANITARIO PARA LOS TRABAJADORES ↗
  • Who funds MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…NEO Philanthropy IncNational Day Laborer …The Ford FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…Borealis PhilanthropyTides CenterNew Venture FundTides FoundationSolidago FoundationMarguerite Casey Foun…WK Kellogg Foundation
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC59.1× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · National Day Laborer Organizing Network · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Tides Center · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Solidago Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Connecticut Worker Center Inc: 67% of income from government
  • The Education & Training Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Voz Workers Rights Education Project: 12% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Brazilian Worker Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Brazilian Women's Group Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Domestic Workers Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home